KRIPAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-17. KRIPAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
(1 of 2) [CW-12955/2020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12955/2020 Kripal Singh S/o Shri Sayar Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of 13-G-2, Jagdamba Nagar, Bajrang Dhavar, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj. ) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj. ) 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj. ) 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. OP Sangwa through Cisco Webex App For Respondent(s) : - JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 17/12/2020 Referring to the opinion of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Om Prakash Bairwa Versus State of Rajasthan & st Ors. : S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.
5863 of 2017, decided on 21 April, 2017, learned counsel contended that the petitioner therein (Om Prakash Bairwa), was allowed to address a comprehensive representation to the State-respondents referring to Rule 296 of the Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 and other relevant Rules applicable to the case of the relaxation with regard to the age. It is further prayed that for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner for relaxation of the (2 of 2) [CW-12955/2020] age under the Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 and other relevant Rules, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter. In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation for ventilating the grievances raised herein.
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed off. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 9-Amar/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.