ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited v. Manjula
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-06. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited v. Manjula. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
34481 [ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B. R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1284 OF 2017 Appeal Under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 against the order datd 1110912017 passed in E. C. No. 'tB6 ot 2016 on the file of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour-l, Hyderabad. Between : lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Manager (Claims) D. No. 6-3-352i 1, Osman Plaza, Nagarjuna Circle, Banjara Hills, Hydergbad, Telangana State. ... AppellanUOpposite Party No. 2 AND 1. Manjula, Wo. Late Mallesh, age 22 years, Occ Housewife, 2. Kum. K. Shiva Jyothi, Dio. Late Mallesh, age 3 years, Occ nil, 3. Sri K. Narayana, S/o. Late Hanumaiah, age 60 years, Occ Labourer, 4. Smt K. Yadamma, Wo. K. Narayana, age 50 years, Occ Housewife, (Respondent No.
2 being minor represented by her mother and natural guardian, the respondent No. 1 ) All are Rl/o. 1- 19/1/A, Thirumalagiri, Scunderabad, Telangana State. ... Respondent No. 1 to 4/Applicants 5. Gopal Reddy Gotike, S/o. Venkat Reddy, Occ Owner of tractor and trailer, R/o. H. No. 1-29, Ayyavaripally Village, Chinchod, Faroocinagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, Telangana State. ... Respondent No. 5/Respondent No. 1 . A. NO: 2OF 2017 CMAMP. NO: 2304 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 11logl2117 passed in E. C. No. 186 of 2016, On the file of The Commissioner for Employee's Compensation and Deputy -r Commissioner of Labour-|, Hyderabad including the withd wal of the amount deposited pending the disposal of the C. M. A. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Katta Laxmi Pra; rd Counsel for the Respondent No. l to 4: Sri A.
Chaya Devi Counsel for the Respondent No. S : -- - The Court made the following : JUDGMENT c]. -:7 IN THE HIGII COURT FIOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABN) THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B. R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO C. M. A. No. 1284 of 2Ol7 DATED THE 6th DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 Betseen: ICICI l,ombard General Insurance Co. Ltd Appellant And Manjula and others ... Respondents JUDGMENT: 1. This . C. M. A. is settled before Lok Adalat vide Award dated 21. L2. 2O25 passed by the tok Adalat Bench of High Court Lrgal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. In view of the same, nothing remains in the present C. M. A. 2. Accordingly, this C. M. A. is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 21. 12. 2O25 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench of High Court kgal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders if any shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petition/ s shall stand closed Sd/. T.
KRISHNA KUMAR JOINT REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPY// 4e1 SECTION OFFICER 1. The Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour-1, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri Katta Laxmi prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 3. CC to Sri A. Chaya Devi, Advocate Qne topuil 4. Two CD Copies M- SVS/BA (Along with a copyofaward dated 21. 12. 2005 passcd by Loh Adalat) DATED:0610112026 TH. R s la ( o , € o () ti'i , [l3'? ;,pfr z \\ JUDGMENT * * CMA. No. 1284 ot 2017 DISPOSING OF THE CMA 0l-1 t c\ t T /7 I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT L HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE \ (HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) \e J nder Section l g of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 19E7 (Central Act)l -{ Date: 21-12-2025 Present:'1. Hon'ble Sri Justice Gouse Meera Mohiuddin, (Judge, High court for the State of Telangana) s. ri Chairman 2. Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate, o Member T 4- 9 T 8iT:ifr = C. M. A. No. 1284 of 2017 t (Before the Hon'ble High Court) o. & * AGAINST ol E. C. No.
186 of 2016 (On the fite of the Commissioner for Emptoyees' Compensation and Depuly Cg4missioner of Labour'l: T. Anjaiah Kaimika Samkhema Bhavanam, RTC Cross Roads: Hyderabad) BETWEEN: '---'--"------- -. ' ',. a - :'"rr'::''? :': lClCl Lombard General lrisuraqrce Company Limited, Represented by its Mandge-i, (Ctaims), D. No. 6-3- 352/ 1, Osnia'niPtaza, NaEarjuna Circte, Banjara Hitts, Hyderabdll, Tetangana State. ... Appettant/Opposite Party No. 2 AND 1. Manjuta, W/o" Late Ma[[esh, age; 22 years. Occ: Housewife, 2. Kum. K. Shiva Jyothi,,D/o. Late Maltesh, aged 3 years, Occ: ni[, 3. Sri K. Narayana, S/o. Late Hanumaiah, aged: 60 years, Occ: Labourer, 4. smt. K. Yadamma, W/o. K. Narayana, age: 50 years, Occ:. Housewife, (Respondent No. 2 being minor, represented by her mother and naturat Guardian, the respondent No. 1 ) No"l to 4/Appticants' "'respondent Att are R/o. 1-19l1/A, Thirumatagiri, Secunderabad, Telangana State. 5. Gopat Reddy Gotike, S/o.
Venkat Reddy, Occ: Owner of tractor and traiter, R/o. . No. 1 -29, Ayyavariapally Vittage Chinchod, Farooqnagar Mandat, Mahaboobnagar District, Tetangana 5tate. ...... Respondent No. 5 / Responden t No. 1 \-r,o'- AWARD clt; ltenging 1. This is an appeal fited by the Appellant/ lnsurance Company the order dated 11-09-2017 passed in E. C. No. 186 of 2016 by the Commissioner for Labour-1, Emptoyees' Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Hyderabad. Ctairr 2. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabeer, Senior Manager- Legat s - The Authorized Company, has appearB and represented representative of Appettant/ lnsurance pursue the that the lnsurance Company decided not to t)l :sent appeal and therefore they are withdrawing the appeat. :t': 1'- , J The said representation is recorded and. the appeal is dismis ed aS. withdrawn, confirming the order of the Commissioner for Emptoyees' -ompensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour-|, Hyderabad. The amount.
if any, remaining rmpany within one unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance I month from the date of r:eceipt of the award, alorig with intere;1 On such deposit, the RespoMent/Ctaimant(s) is/are pernri :ted to withdraw 4 his/her/their respective amount/s as per the award passed trr Commissioner for Emptoyees' Compensation and Deputy Ccimmissioner of Labour- r, Hyderabad. ln case, the parties subsequently come to know about fiting of cross appeat/cross 5 objection, they are given tiberty to seek recatl of this Order/Av'; rd. 6 Court fee paid on this appeal shatl be refunded. 7 No costs GENERAL INSURA a5 cost ccDE::, 9-AJ j o i' ( 2 o ** * Ap Paftr/No. 2 nsurance om n ix ^lt1 lfi A CHAIRATAN MEMBER SEP (_) d. @(tto{om ) tr1 * * -6tw -St"
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.