SHRI. H. NYENYAK PHOM v. SHRI. KESONYU YHOME,IAS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2025-06-08. SHRI. H. NYENYAK PHOM v. SHRI. KESONYU YHOME,IAS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020002652022 2025:GAU-NL:242 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : COP(C)/17/2022 SHRI. H. NYENYAK PHOM W/C LABOUR, E. E. PED (R AND B), LONGLENG DIV. LONGLENG NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI. KESONYU YHOME,IAS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND, WORKS AND HOUSING, NAGALAND, KOHIMA 3:ER. KAHULI NSEMA ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:SHRI. SENTIYANGER IAS FINANCE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:ER. TOSHI ANGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : M. ATHAI, R SEMY,HISINLO HIMB Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No. # 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 09/06/2025 The State respondents have issued an Office Memorandum No .
th AR-3/GEN-67/2001 dated 5 March, 2025 by which it is provided that, “on the recommendation of the Nagaland Work-Charge and Casual Employees Commission and in pursuance of the Cabinet’s th decision conveyed vide letter No. CAB-1/14/2023 dated 25 February 2025, all Work-Charged and Casual employees in all the Departments, whose names have been duly verified by the District Level Verification Committee and registered in PIMS, receiving fixed pay shall be granted scale of pay as per the Revision of Pay, 2015 with effect from 01. 04. 2025. Therefore, all Departments having Work-Charged and Casual employees are directed to expedite the conversion accordingly. ” The learned Government Advocate, Ms. Livika appearing on behalf of all the comtemnors has submitted that the grievance of the th petitioner can be addressed by the Office O. M. 5 March, 2025 and accordingly the present contempt petition may be disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the same.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Page No. # 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.