Kshetrimayum Ranju Devi v. State of Manipur And Another
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-09-18. Kshetrimayum Ranju Devi v. State of Manipur And Another. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 657 of 2024 Kshetrimayum Ranju Devi ….. Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur & Anr. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 18. 09. 2024 [1] Heard Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Shahidur Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. [2] The petitioner who is a Science Graduate Teacher in the Department of Education (S), Government of Manipur was kept under suspension on 09. 06. 2022 and suspension order has not been reviewed or extended before the expiry of 90 days. [3] It is stated that subsistence allowance has not been paid till date and as such, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 05. 09. 2024 to the Director (Education-S), Government of Manipur for paying subsistence allowance with revocation of the suspension order dated 09. 06. 2022. Till date, neither the subsistence allowance is granted nor has suspension order been revoked. [4] Mr. S.
Rupachandra, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2/Director (Education-S), Government of Manipur herein to consider the representation dated 05. 09. 2024 submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order as per rule within a stipulated period of time. [5] Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned G. A. for the State respondent, has no objection in passing an innocuous order as prayed for. [6] Recording the submissions made at bar, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2/Director (Education-S),Government of Manipur to dispose of the representation dated 05. 09. 2024 submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order as per rule within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [7] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. [8] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for all the parties.
JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring Digitally signed by KH. KH. JOSHUA JOSHUA MARING Date: 2024. 09. 18 MARING 13:31:39 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.