Arun Sahani v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-21. Arun Sahani v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89247 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -67 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arun Sahani S/O Chand Sahani @ Chanda Sahani R/O Villager- Gorigawan, P. S- Sugauli, Distt. - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. X W/O Shyam Sundra Sahani R/O Village- Dumari, P. S- Sugauli, Distt. - East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 21-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P. S. Case No.
67/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 87, 3(5) of the B. N. S. and Section 8 of POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of kidnapping the victim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the victim girl has stated that she had got married with the petitioner. Learned counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 89247 of 2025(4) dt. 21-04-2026 2/2 further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 14. 08. 2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the th satisfaction of the learned 6 Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, POCSO Act, Motihari, East Champaran, Bihar /concerned Court below in connection with Sugauli P. S. Case No. 67/2025. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.