SHEETALA MATA SWA SAHAYATA SAMOOH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GOUTAM BHADURI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-12-11. SHEETALA MATA SWA SAHAYATA SAMOOH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2962 of 2020 • Sheetala Mata Swa Sahayata Samooh Jondhara, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Through Its President Namely Smt. Bimala Bai, Aged About 48 Years W/o Shri Ram Ji Barai, R/o Village Jondhara, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 2. The Director Directorate Of Women And Child Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 3. The Commissioner Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4. The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5. The District Programme Officer Women And Child Development Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6.
The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project, Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Gagan Tiwari, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 11/12/2020 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the cancellation of the supply of ready to eat food material, the petitioner initially filed the first appeal before the Collector according to the guidelines issued by the State on 05. 06. 2017 & 03. 12. 2019. Subsequently, against the order of the Collector, the petitioner has preferred the second appeal before the Commissioner, Bilaspur as per guideline 9 and according to the guideline it purports that if such second appeal is filed, that shall be decided within a period of 8 weeks as far as possible.
He would further submit that though the petitioner has preferred the st second appeal vide Annexure P-4 on 31 of August, 2020, however, the same is not been decided till date, therefore, the Commissioner may be directed to decide the second appeal within a specified time. 3. Perused the guideline which has been issued by the State from time to time. In respect of the second appeal the directions stands as under:- 9- laHkkxk;qDr ds le{k f}rh; vihy dh izfdz;k%& 9-1 ftyk dysDVj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k ds fo:) laHkkxh; vk;qDr ds le{k izekf. kr izfr izkIr djus dh frfFk ls 30 fnol ds Hkhrj f}rh; vihy izLrqr dh tk ldsxhA 9-2 laHkkxh; vk;qDr }kjk izdj. k dh lquokbZ dh tk;sxh] ftlesa lewg rFkk ftyk dk;Zdze vf/kdkjh@ftyk efgyk ,oa cky fodkl vf/kdkjh nksuksa dks viuk i{k j[kus dk iw. kZ volj izkIr gksxkA 9-3 izdj. k ij ;FkklaHko 08 lIrkg ds Hkhrj lquokbZ iw. kZ dh tk;sxhA i`Fkd uLrh esa lquokbZ dh izfdz;k dh tk;sxhA izdj. k esa xq.
k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij laHkkx vk;qDr }kjk LoO;k[;kRed Li"V vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA 9-4 vkns'k dh izekf. r izfr izkIr djuk mHk; i{kksa dh ftEesnkjh gksxhA ikfjr vkns'k ds fo:) izekf. kr izfr izkIr djus dh frfFk ls 30 fnol ds Hkhrj l{ke U;k;ky; esa okn izLrqr djus ds fy;s Lora= gksxkA 4. Considering the fact that the second appeal has already been preferred against the order of the Collector dated 10. 08. 2020, the Commissioner is directed to decide the said second appeal preferred by the petitioner within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/-Sd/-/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.