SUNIL TANA BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-02. SUNIL TANA BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S). No. 3220 of 2022 1. Sunil Tana Bhagat aged about 24 years, S/o Sudershan Tana Bhagat, R/o Ludgo, P. O. – Aranga, P. S. – Ghaghra, Duko District – Gumla Jharkhand. 2. Darshan Oraon aged about 23 years, S/o Bifai Oraon, R/o Chanchi, P. O. & P. S. - Ghaghra Nowdiha, District – Gumla Jharkhand. 3. Priyanka Bhagat aged about 22 years, D/o Duma Bhagat, R/o Ghobra, P. O. -Khota, P. S. – Gumla Khota, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 4. Birsa Bhagat aged about 28 years, S/o Firu Bhagat, R/o Dhidholi Jain Toli, P. O. – Dhidholi, P. S. – Gumla, Gherhauli, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 5. Manoj Bhagat, aged about 29 years, S/o Rainu Bhagat, R/o Khursuta, P. O. – Kansir, P. S. – Raidih, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 6. Sandeep Tana Bhagat, aged about 22 years, S/o Birsa Tana Bhagat, R/o Sakra, P. O. & P. S. - Mandar, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 7. Sandeep Bhagat aged about 22 years, S/o Laldeo Bhagat, R/o Sans, P. O. – Aan, P. S.
– Chandwa, District – Latehar, Jharkhand. 8. Surendra Bhagat aged about 27 eyars, S/o Shivraj Bhagat, R/o Dadha, P. O. – Dadha, P. S. – Balumath, District – Latehar, Jharkhand. 9. Bachchu Oraon aged about 21 years, S/o Parimal Oraon, R/o Pokhariya, P. O. – Nawa Jaipur, P. S. – Patan, District – Palamau, Jharkhand. 10. Mahabir Bhagat, aged about 24 years, S/o Yugesh Bhagat, R/o Mahuwatoli, P. O. – Parsa, P. S. – Raidih, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 11. Meena Kumari Bhagat, aged about 25 years, D/o Mahesh Bhagat, R/o Savitri Colony, Jarangih near K. B. College, Bermo, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand. 12. Sumit Bhagat, aged about 23 years, S/o Soma Bhagat, R/o Pugu Daudnagar, P. O. – Armai, P. S. – Gumla, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 13. Neha Kumar aged about 21 years, S/o Shanker Bhagat, R/o Chakla, P. O. – Damodar, P. S. – Chandwa, District – Latehar, Jharkhand. 14. Sukari Kumar aged about 21 years, D/o Rambriksha Bhagat, R/o Rol, P. O. & P. S. & District – Latehar, Jharkhand. 15.
Sumari Kumari aged about 20 years, D/o Jago Bhagat, R/o Porha Dhipa, P. O. – Semra P. S. – Bhadra, District – Lohardaga, Jharkhand. 16. Prem Chand Tana Bhagat, aged about 23 years, S/o Krishna Tana Bhagat, R/o Kasina Mangna Toli, P. O. – Karounda, P. S. – Gumla, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. 17. Sandeep Bhagat, aged about 21 years, S/o Birsa Bhagat, R/o Bargadh P. O. – Patratu, P. S. – Chanho, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 18. Prakash Tana Bhagat, aged about 21 year, S/o Surendra Tana Bhagat, R/o Kasira, Mangna Toli, P. O. – Karaonda, P. S. – Gumla Kasira, District – Gumla, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P. O. & P. S. - & District – Ranchi. 3. Inspector General of Police, South Chhotanaagpur, Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P. O. & P. S. - Dhurwa, District – Ranchi. 4. Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Jharkhand, P. O. & P. S. - Dhurwa, District – Ranchi.
… … Respondents --- CORAM :HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Divya, AC to SC-III ---nd 06/02 December 2024 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners have approached this Court for a direction upon the respondents to provide employment in Police Force in view of the letter of Government of Jharkhand vide letter no. 6/ Tana Bhagat – 287/ 2017-522 (6) / Ra. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the petitioners to file fresh representation for redressal of their grievances and upon receipt of the same, respondents may be directed to pass reasoned order on their representation within a stipulated period of time. 4.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if this Court directs the petitioners to file fresh representation before the respondent-authorities, the respondents shall pass reasoned order on the same. 5. In view of the fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I hereby direct the petitioners to file fresh representation annexing all the relevant documents on which they are relying, withing a period of two weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order and after receiving the same alongwith the copy of this order, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law and after giving ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, pass a speaking and reasoned order taking into account the prevalent rules, guidelines and circulars, within a further period of six weeks, which shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 6.
It goes without saying that if the petitioners are found entitled for the benefits, as prayed for, the same may be extended to them within a further period of four weeks. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J. ) Aditi
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.