Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Gummadi Shankar v. The Chairman and Managing Director,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-17. Gummadi Shankar v. The Chairman and Managing Director,. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 24457 OF 2018 Between: G-ummadi Shankar, S/o. It/allaiah, E. C. No. 1102106, GDK-7 LEp lvline, Aged about years Occ- Rtd Employee Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Q9 R/6. 8-6-378, Bhagathsingh Nagar, 5 lnc. , Godavbrikhani, Viattalanagai, Kdrimnagar District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The Chairman and I\,4anaging Director, Singareni Collieries Company Limjted, - Singareni Bhavan, Read Hils, Hyderabad. 2. The Director (PA and W! The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Kammam District. 3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Welfare Wing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad. 4 Cglqrg! -N/anager, Godavarikani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Lt Limited ".

(sccl)' Karimnagar District ... RES'. NDENT. Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased lo issue to a wnt, order or direction and more parlicularly one in the nature of writ of N,4andamus declaring that the acts, deeds and things of the Respondents Letter Ref. No. RG2/PER1CF1012, dated 02-0'1-2018 in rejecting dependent emptoyment to the Petitioner's son in the Respondent Company is illegal,arbitrary and violative of rights guaranteed by the Constrtution of lndia, against to the Mines Act 1952 and its Rules 1955 and National Coal Wages Agreement (NCWA) and consequenfly declare that Petitioner is eligible for dependent Employment in the Respondent Company and further directed to provide employment to the Petitioner's son in the Respondent Co m pa ny.

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide dependent employment to the Petitioners son, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl CH. VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI J. SREENIVASA RAO, SC FOR SCCL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION N o2Ms7 0F 2018 ORDER: Sri Ch. Venkat Raman. counsel for the petitioner. has filed a letter dated 16. 12. 2O20 before the Registry seeking permission to withdraw this writ petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitionJ, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. M. MANJ A ASSISTANT REG R //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri CH. Venkat Raman Advocate [OpUC] 2. One CC to Sri J.

Sreenivasa Rao, SC for SCCi Advoiate IOPUCI 3. Two CD Copies SM lrtv HIGH COURT DATEOt17l12i2020 ,. :l ORDER 1 He s TA WP. No. 24457 of 2018 () 04 JAil 202t "t ! ] * DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS \')-\ " I\lx

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.