SHIHAB C.E. v. GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-02-16. SHIHAB C.E. v. GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN TH FRIDAY, THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 4221 OF 2015 PETITIONER: SHIHAB C. E. AGED 31 YEARS CHETTUKUDY HOUSE, IRAMALLOOR P. O, KOTHAMANGALAM ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI. SALIM V. S. SRI. P. V. JEEVESH SRI. H. NUJUMUDEEN SRI. SHANAVAS. S RESPONDENTS: 1 GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 302 2 DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER HR BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. , KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 302 3 THE MANAGER (PROMOTION AND RECRUITMENT) BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. , KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 302. 4 TONY THOMAS (SELECTED CANDIDATE, WORKMAN-B(TRAINEE), MECHANIC (MOTOR VEHICLE), C/O. THE MANAGER, (PROMOTION AND RECRUITMENT), B. P. C. L. KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 302.
5 SURESH (SELECTED CANDIDATE, WORKMAN-B(TRAINEE), MECHANIC (MOTOR VEHICLE), C/O. THE MANAGER, (PROMOTION AND RECRUITMENT), B. P. C. L. KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 302. BY ADVS. SRI. P. BENNY THOMAS SRI. D. PREM KAMATH SRI BIJOY CHANDRAN, SR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16. 02. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C). No. 4221/2015 P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- W. P. (C). No. 4221 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------th Dated this the 16 day of February, 2024 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed with following prayers: i. To call for the entire records, pertaining to the selection to the post of General Workman- B C, Mechanic (motor vehicle) as per exhibit P1 notification and issue a writ of certiorari quashing the same. ii. Declare that the selection and appointment of the th th 4 and 5 respondents as General Workman- B, Mechanic (motor vehicle), Is Illegal. iii.
issue a writ of mandamus or any other order directing the respondent 1 to 3, to give appointment to the petitioner to the post of Workman Grade- B (Trainee), Mechanic (motor vehicle). st iv. direct the 1 respondent to consider the Exhibit P6 representation and pass appropriate orders after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, in the interest of justice. v. grant such other reliefs as this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (SIC) WP(C). No. 4221/2015 st 2. It is submitted by the counsel for the 1 respondent that recruitment to the post of General Workman-B is already over and the appointment is also made long back. There is no interim order passed in this case. There is also no representation for the petitioner. Probably the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.