SANJAY v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2025-09-23. SANJAY v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA th ON THE 30 OF MARCH, 2022 WRIT PETITION No. 7294 of 2022 Between:- SANJAY S/O RAMBAHADUR SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS (SANCHI PARLOR) GANDHI NAGAR PASCHIM LINE, MANAWAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI LOKESH MEHTA, ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DISTRIC COLLECTOR COLLECTOR OFFICE (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER TEH. MANAWAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. TEHSILDAR DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SANJAY JOHAR S/O LATE SHRI MANGILAL JOHAR OCCUPATION: BUSINESS LOHARPATTI, MANAWAR DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY MS. VINITA PHAYE, G. A. FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3 ON ADVANCE COPY ) T h is petition coming on for orders this day, the court passed the following: ORDER The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashment of the order dated 28/2/2022.
Counsel for petitioner submits that the respondents have initiated proceedings for removal of encroachment u/S. 248 of MPLR Code, but without passing any final order they are taking action for removal of the shop of the petitioner. Upon perusal of the record, it is evident that the Tehsildar, Manawar has Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by initiated the proceedings u/S. 248 of MPLR Code and has called a report from RI SAN VARGHESE MATHEW Date: 2022. 03. 31 10:12:00 IST and thereafter the matter was fixed for 22/3/2022. The petitioner has not filed any proceeding of the said date. Counsel for State submits that the action for removal of encroachment shall be taken in accordance with law and after passing the order u/S. 248 of MPLR Code. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to pass final order u/S. 248 of MPLR Code and thereafter to proceed with the removal of encroachment in accordance with law.
The Authority will not take any action for removal of encrochment without passing the order u/S. 248 of MPLR Code. (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE VM Signature Not VerifiedSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDigitally signed by SANSAN VARGHESEVARGHESE MATHEWMATHEW Date: 2022. 03. 31Date: 2022. 03. 31 10:12:00 IST10:12:00 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.