Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ARVIND SONAR ALIAS ANAD SONAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-10. ARVIND SONAR ALIAS ANAD SONAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10226 of 2024 ------ Bittu Sonar, aged about 30 years, S/o Late Biru Sonar, R/o- Nawagarh Sonar tola, P. O. + P. S. - Madhuban, Dist. - Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B. A. No. 10252 of 2024 Arvind Sonar @ Anand Sonar, aged about 26 years S/o Subodh Sonar, R/o- Nawagarh Basti, P. O. + P. S. - Madhuban, Dist. - Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : M/s. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State : M/s. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Special P. P. : M/s. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Special P. P. ----- 02/10. 12. 2024 Both these Bail Applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. 1. Heard the parties 2. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Bermo P. S. Case No.

83/2024, for the offences registered under Sections 387/ 307/ 34 of the I. P. C. and 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned S. D. J. M. Bermo at Tenughat. 3. On 12. 06. 2024, at about 09:35 a. m. , two unknown persons had opened fire outside the jewelry shop of the informant damaging the window pane of the shop. The occurrence has taken place to enforce the demand of Rangdari of Rs. 20,00,000/- 4. It was submitted that the petitioners are neither named in the F. I. R. , nor they were put on T. I. Parade. It was further submitted that nothing has been recovered from their possession and similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail by this Court earlier. 5. Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, learned Special P. P. has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. In view of the submissions made above, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S. D. J. M. Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Bermo P. S. Case No. 83/2024. (Ambuj Nath, J. ) Nandini/- Uploaded

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.