G.Abdul Khaliq v. G.Lakshmidevamma
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-03-20. G.Abdul Khaliq v. G.Lakshmidevamma. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
*\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 2984 OF 2004 Appeal filed under Section 96 of C. P. C, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree in O. S. No. 78/1998,dated. 28/1/2002,on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge,Kurnool. Between: G. Abdul Khaliq, S/o. Mohammed Ibrahim, aged about 50 years, R/o. Door No. 22-4, Sector-1, PushpVihar, New Delhi-110 017 ... Appellant/Defendant AND G. Lakshmidevamma, W/o. G. C. Lakshmanna, aged about 45 years, Occ; Household & living by property, R/o. Door NO. 56/22, Khanderi Street, Kurnool. ... Respondent/Plaintiff I. A. NO: 3 OF 2003rCMP. NO: 25859 OF 2QQ31 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings of the decree dtd.
28/1/2002 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge,Kurnool in O. S. NO. 78/1998 including the execution of sale deed pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri S. Sharat Kumar - not present Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K. Sita Ram The Court made the following: A THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No. 2984 of 2004 JUDGMENT: When the matter came up for hearing on 13. 03. 2024, and the there is no representation on behalf of the appellant the learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that a sole-appellant was died on 09. 05. 2021 and to that effect Memo was also filed before the Registry. Recording the same, for taking steps, if any, the matter was posted to today. 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, for taking of the steps, if any, there is no representation on behalf is appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents alone present. No Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending. shall stand closed. SDI- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri S. Sharat Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri K. Sita Ram, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies. stu ssb / HIGH COURT DATED:20/03/2024 ANOTy^ JUDGMENT g 0 MAY 202‘» Co AS. No. 2984 of 2004 ^ Coj3(Lu r? DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS ABATED
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.