Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-10-29. MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

( 2025:HHC:35868 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16786 of 2025 th Decided on: 29 October, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mohinder Singh and others ….. Petitioners Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners grievance is that their representations dated 25. 09.

2025 (Annexure P-4) seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of 2 H. P. & Ors. have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29. 11. 2024 ( 2025:HHC:35868 ) petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4.

Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the 2 above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 29, 2025 Judge yogesh

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.