CHANDAN @ BAAJ S/O SHRI VEER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-16. CHANDAN @ BAAJ S/O SHRI VEER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:51733] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12302/2024 Chandan @ Baaj S/o Shri Veer Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Thimauchoti Police Station Hameerwas District Churu (Raj. ). (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyat Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. R. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/12/2024 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B. N. S. S. , on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 96/2024 registered at the Police Station Mandrela, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 125, 126(2), 3(5), 324(2), 307 & 115(2) of B. N. S. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
He further submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. Petitioner is in custody since 16. 09. 2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose and trial will take considerable time. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. [2024:RJ-JP:51733] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12302/2024] 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the nature of injuries, looking to the period of custody and filing of charge-sheet, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the present bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 6.
This present bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Chandan @ Baaj S/o Shri Veer Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned Police Station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
[2024:RJ-JP:51733] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12302/2024] 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain the record of presence of the appellant as directed and in case of any default, he will report the matter to the concerned Court immediately. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Aayush Sharma /89
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.