Emmadishetty Prashanth v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-02-21. Emmadishetty Prashanth v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR , PRESENT i THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA l. A. No. 2 of 2O24 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No: 1316 OF 2024 Between: 1. Emmadishetty S/o. Ernmadhishetty Venugopal, aged about 30 -Prashanth, years, Occ. Software N/o. H. No.. l7-i -3BBlpl2O, purn-odaya . Engineer, cotony, Saidabad, ft! 91ap90, Telangana - S00 59, currenfly residing plaza at Vork 'lvlinneso6 Apartment, 7240 York Avenue South, 307 Edina, state, United . l States of America - 55435. Petitioner/Accused No. is currenfly residing in USA and thus is being represented by his father and authorized'Spn noEer, Emmadishetty Venugopal, petitioner/ accused No. 2 herein. 2. Emmadishetty Venu Gopal, S/o. Late Emmadishetty Ramakrishna Rao. aoed about 61 years, Occ, Retd. Employee, H. No. il-1-Seepzo, purnodiya colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 59. - 3. Emmadishetty. Laxnii, Wo.
Emmadi6hetty Venugopal, aged about 52 years, Occ, Homemaker, R/o. H. No. 1l- 1-3Sblpt2d, purnodaya cirlony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 59. ... Petitioners/Accused AND 1. State of Telangana, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. 2. Raya pud i Mes ha na, wo. Em mad ishe tty era sna nirrTB;3"fiffJr":iil5lX',lf "' a. ged about2T years, Occ. Honiemaker, Rl/o. Ftat l! qqnq1, trto. ZOZ, C-Btock, NCL Godawari Homes, Jeedimetta village, Quthbultapur mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri district, Telangana - 500 062. - ... RespondenUDefacto-Complainants Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr. p. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 2575 of 2023, pending on the file of the lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal - Malkajgiri district considering the compromised arrived between the petitioners and respondent No. 2. I. A.
N 20F 2024 Between: Rayapudi Meghana, Wo. Emmadishetty Prashanth, D/o. Rayapudi Mahesh Kumar, aged about 27 years, Occ. Homemaker, R/o. Flat No. 207, C-Block, NCL Godawari Homes, Jeedimetta village, Quthbultapur mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri district, Telangana - 500 067. ... Petitioner /Respondent No. 2/Defacto-Complainant And 1. Emmadishetty Prashanth, S/o. Ernmadhishetty Venugopal, aged about 30 years, Occ. Software Engineer, N/o. H. No. 1 7-1 -3BB|P l2o, Purnodaya colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 59, currently residing at York Plaza Apartment, 724O York Avenue South, 307 Edina, Minnesota state, United States of America - 55435. Petitioner/Accused No. 1 is currently residing in USA and thus is being represented by his father and authorized SPA holder, Emmadishetty Venugopal, petitioneri accused No. 2 herein. 2. Emmadishetty Venu Gopal, S/o. Late Emmadishetty Ramakrishna Rao, aged about 61 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, H. No.
17-1-3881P12O, Purnodaya colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 59. 3. Emmadishetty Laxmi, W/o. Emmadishetty Venugopal, aged about 52 years, Occ. Homemaker, Rl/o. H. No. 17- 1-3881P120, Purnodaya colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 59. ... Rspondents/Petitioners/Accused 4. State of Telangana, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad ..... RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 320 (6) of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit accompanying the Joint Memo and Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between the petitioner / respondent no. 2 / defacto- complainant and respondents/ petitioners / accused and to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 2575 of 2023, pending on the file of the lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, for the offences under sections 498-A and 42O ol the lndian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
This Criminal Petition and coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and lnterlocutory application No. 2l2O2 and upon perusing the affidavit accompanying the Joint Memo and Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SRI CH MANI CHARAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Sri P. Sree Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER SMT' JUSTICE K'SUJANA THE HONOURABLE I. A. No. 2 of 2024 in and 202 4 TION No. 1316 of cRIMINAL NORDER: coMMO for the by the learned counsel appearing It is submitted that during pendency well as the respondent No'2' petitioner as have compromised Criminal Petition' the parties of the present to been filed of 2024 has I'A'No'2 accordingly' the matter and between them' record the compromise the directed this Court 2.
Vide order dated 05'02'2024' the counsel to appear before I with their respective parties along , Court for Committee' High High Court Legal Services Secretary, and to for identihcation of Telangana' Hyderabad' the State submit a rePort' this Court' issued by to the above said direction 3. Pursuant kgal High Court Secretary' anrl the appeared the parties have a submitted has identified the parties and Services Committee' is placed on record' and the sarne 13 report, dated 'O2 '2024 is allowed' A'No'2 of 2024 the above, I vrew of 4. In and the is allowed Petition this Criminal Consequently, learned IX hle of the 5 of 2023 on the in C'C'No'257 proceedings District Magistrate' Medchal-Malkajgiri Additional Metropolitan t at Medchal against the petitioners/ accused are hereby quashed subject to payrng an amount of Rs. S,OOO/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c. No.
52188926229, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2OOTO\, IFSC Code :SBINOO20O7O, MICR No. 5O0O04O57) and Rs. S,OOO/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (O2) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. Miscellancous applications, if any pending, shall stald closcd. sd/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGIffiAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal - Malkajgiri District 2. The Station House Officer, Petbasheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad. 3. Two CCs the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telagana, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One CC to SRI CH. IVANI CHARAN, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One CC to SRI P. SREE KUMAR, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) b NOTE: Amount paid by Sri P. SREE KUMAR, Counsel for the petitioner towards costs of Rs.
5,000/- ( Rupees Five Thousand only ) directed by the Hon'ble Court, dated 21 . 02. 2024 to the Sainik Welfare Board, Hyderabad vide its Account No. 52188926279 and filed Memo of Proof of Compliance vide USR No22612 of 2024 dated 01 . 03. 2024. r: : HIGH COURT DATED:21 10212024 COI\4MON ORDER ::-_ I. A. No. 2 of 2014 rA 1r{ ( inlAnd . i CRLP. No. 1316 of 2024 . J it 4 Airi i'[1i tt ' ---. ----;:, ALLOWING THE I. A. No. 2 of 2024 Of CRL. P. No. 1316 of 2024 crot' ffir \i i OF TI'LANCANA FOR TIIE STNII' O F JUDICA. IURE COURI I NI THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD. of 2024 I. A. No. IN r? ti of 2024 CRL. P' No. AGAINST of 2023' C. C. No. 2575 BET WE EN D/o' Prashanth, W/o Emmadishetty Meghana' Rayapudi Occ: about 27 Years, Mahesh Kumar' aged / *rir"lra, Petitioner NCL Godawari R/o. Ftat No 2o7' C-Btock' No' 2 / l"'r! rn"n"'' Respondent Iapur mandat, vittaEe' Quthbut mPta inanl Defacto-Co *1rn"r,-r"Lotrn"t'' - 500 067.
district' Tetangana fqatftaigirr MeOcnat - i AND l Emmadishettv I'::l'-l'i; #'*r,-,)l r rtJl;, aged about Venugopat, *t G" :ru;'#:' i .. ,#,,-11k1,'jT;J'.. 1,1 HYderar cotony, Saidabad' 7240 York at Yo'k Plaza Apartment' Irrr",li,r r". rd'ng state' united Minnesota r"soz roinu' ;;;;;'t. ;it' 55435' America - States of N: i^s#f Petitioner/Accused ";Y ::: l ;:: iI? :: is being tlo'"ll'. ld,l'n",,y and thus V. nreoprt, r SPA holder' authorized no' 2lteretn' petitioner/ accused shetry u"n, Go,paL&. 2 Emmadi [:: l=l:i:l i'J:":J o? "' Ramakrishna . T:0"::;;zJ,' d*nooryu -1- H' No 17 3u "oLonv, EmPloyee, s00 5e' -rt"rabad' Tetangana - ! li5r. '"a", a EmmadishettyLaxmi:w1:HE#:Xtj;:;ilY"JiTi'i: / s2 aged about vears' ResPondents Hya",,oua, """' co ['";]"r:l;:;ua, Petttio n e rs / Accused alssatPtzo,PurtrodaYa 59' Tetangana - 500 / ResPondent ConrPtainant 4 . StateofTetanganarepr:ytl-rePubticProsecutor'Hi9h Court, HYderabad-r_ I !
COMPR o MISE PET ITION rt is' therefore' ,rayed that this Honorabre court may be preased to record the compromise between the petitioner / respondent no. 2 / def acro-co mpla inant respondents / petrtioners and / accused and to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 2575 2023' pending of on the fite ot the Learned rx Additionat Metropotrtan Mag;strate, Medchat, Medcha[ - Matkaigiri district, for the atteged offences undersections 4gg_Aand the lndian penat 4200f Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowr such orher order or orders as may be deemed ,,, ,r"ur]i,,1l:Hj1::T":::": CASE. "ro o ate, ..!. ,'... 1:..!. 1. :. 1, Ptace: Hyd COUNSEL e ra ba d. R THE PETITIONER / RESPONDENT N o. 2 / DEFACTO-COMPLiINANT r! L::- OF TELANGANA FOR THB STATE F JUDICATURE COURT O IN THE HIGH AT T{YDERABAD of 2024' I. A, NO IN of 2024- CRL. P. No. AGAI N ST I 2023 C. C. No.
2575 of EEN BET w I / Accused i and 2 others Petitioners Prashanth Emmadishetty AND Public rep' by the State of Tetangana HYderabad HIsh court' / ComPtainant ;;. ";;t. ;' Respondents and another ERS FOF T HE PETITION AL oNB EII MEM OF ILED JOI NT TN o. 2 AND RES PON DEN the petitioner and wetl'-wishers' of etders that due to the intervention I to submit 1 It is no'2 wherein' the respondent no' 2 entered into compromise' respondent no. 1 and against the petitioners att her altegations to withdraw pta in ant agreed the / defacto-com proceedings against criminat to pursue the She is no tong"' *ifting /accused. nt hereby no 2 / def acto-comptaina respondent As a matter was petitioners' "t such a stand ""t'tn" and that the petitioners against attegations att her on withdraws coercion of pressure or any kind w *rou"t receivrng votunta(ity taken by her by petitloner is executed of understanding t"'ot"ndurn separate 07. 12.
2023,a no 2'Further'they respondent and the rized rep resentative) (through h is a utho in the said no. 1 stiputated and conditions to the terms to adhere undertake of understanding memorandum the o{fences and since att her atLegations towithdraw no' 2' agreed The respondent respondent 2 in nature' private and m atrimonial are the petitioners and aLteg ed against the (tegat ions against Petitioners her a to withdraw be Permitted the Learned no. 2 may pending on the {ite of 2575 of 2023, s in C. C. No' quash the Proceedlng t . L40rL-c [,t'. t \r F F lXAcjditionatMetrOpolit. }llMagistrate,it4edChaIMatkajgiridiStriCtatMedchal,for 4gB-A' 47A of the lndian Penert Code and the alteged offences under sections or Act and/or to pass such other ordcr sections 3 anc) 4 of the Dowry Prohibition the case'' and proper in the circurnstances of orders as may be deemed fit Hence this Joint Memo I Da te Ptace: HYderabad - ) v". u''t( l: \tL'''\'( \r' '. Ji _) , ' Petitto ner No. 2-' Petitioner No.
i vrxu ooeel] enasuen, u] [EMMADIsHETTv [rlrneorsnrrrv sPA Hol'ler, Petitioner No- 2 herein] ISigned bY authorised 'tt '' , ;,,: ( (L t(ttu' L ' Respondent No. 2 Petitio n e r No' 3 r. recnere] lexltr] Inaveruot [eurvrnoIsnerrv . I 0'tu. ( \;, r$ o No. 2 ers CounseI r the Respondent Counsel tor the P etitio n l
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.