Dharamdeo Ram v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-02-04. Dharamdeo Ram v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6077 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -364 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Dharamdeo Ram S/o Late Suraj Ram 2. Rajaram Ram S/o Late Suraj Ram 3. Ramdeo Ram S/o Late Suraj Ram 4. Brahamdeo Ram @ Braham Deo S/o Late Suraj Ram 5. Tinku Ram S/o Ramdeo Ram 6. Pintu Ram S/o Ramdeo Ram 7. Anil Ram S/o Dharamdeo Ram 8. Lal Ram @ Shivlal Ram @ Shilal Ram @ Shrilal Ram S/o Late Purnbashi Ram 9. Suchit Ram @ Sujeet Ram S/o Lal Ram @ Shilal Ram @ Shivlal Ram @ Shrilal Ram 10. Sajeevan Ram @ Sanjeevan Ram S/o Bishram Ram All Residents of village- Rani, P. S- Dinara, Distt. - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dinara P. S. Case no. 364 of 2025 registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 324(5), 132 and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the 52 named accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 6077 of 2026(2) dt. 04-02-2026 2/3 persons as also 100 unknown accused persons are said to have come variously armed and attacked the informant and others at the police station. The informant states that he managed to escape, however, the accused persons destroyed the property at the police station. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR. They have been falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation.
The allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature and several co-accused who are also named in the FIR have been enlarged on bail. It is submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 17. 10. 2025 and have no criminal antecedent. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the trial. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A. P. P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the petitioners not being named in the FIR, their being in custody since 17. 10. 2025 and grant of bail to several co-accused vide order dated 28. 1. 2026 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 3341 of 2026 and analogous cases and order dated 28. 1. 2026 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 4936 of 2026, the Court directs the petitioners to be enlarged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 6077 of 2026(2) dt. 04-02-2026 3/3 on bail in connection with Dinara P. S. Case no. 364 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj at Rohtas. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.