Mohd Abdul Rasheed Siddiqui v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-29. Mohd Abdul Rasheed Siddiqui v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 954 OF 2026 Between: I\/ohd Abdul Rasheed Siddiqui, S/o. M A. Basith Srddiqui aged about 71 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H No. 7-8-124, lt/lachili Bazar, Hanamkonda Hanamkonda District ... Petitioner/Respondent No. 2 AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep. by rts Public Prosecutor, Hrgh Court at Hyd erabad. ... RespondenURespondent 2. Ayesha Kathoon, Wo. lVlohd. Juned Siddiqui aged about 30 years, Occ Housewrfe. R/o. H. No. 2-8319, Hanuman Nagar, lVanthani, Peddapalli District (Rep. by M. A. Baig, Advocate, IVlanthani) ... Res po n denUPetitioner Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to and in connection wrth D V c No.
1 1/2025 on the file of the Principal Judicial tvlagistrate of First Class at lt/anthanr, and quash the same against the petitioner herein. l. A. No. 2 of 2O26 Petition under sectron 528 of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the lr/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the tiigh Couft may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner ln D V. C. No. 1 1t2025 on the file of the Principal Judrcral Magistrate of Ftrst Class at Irrlanthani, pending disposal of quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Eturi Kalyan Kumar, Advocate representing Sri lVohd. tvloin Ahmed Quadri, Advocate for the Petrtioner and Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy. Addrtronal Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER TN'I'HIi II I(;ll COtlRl' I,-OR TIIE STATE OF'IIi I AN(;AN,A. ;\T IIYDI'lI{ABAI) 'l IlL, Il()NOtlllABLI SRI ,]tiS'IICE J. SREENIT' \S li.. \O (lRI\IINAL PEl'ITION No. 9-54 of 202( I)ate :29. 01. 2026 Ile t',r e en l\,lolrtl . \ lrrltrl Ii:rshcctl Siddiclui petitioner/res -r l ndcn t \o. l Ar'r-l) Thc Sratc ol'-l clrrugana, Ilcprcsented by its Pubtic Pr() j 'cLltr)r. IJiglr Court aL Ilr delabad and another. rcspondcnts ORDF],R f Iris ('r iniinal Pctition has been filed secking o qr-rash thc ploceeclirrgs rgainst petitioner/respondent No. 2 in I ). V. C. No. I I ol l()25, on thc filc o1'tl. re lcarned Principal Judic i I Magistratc - o1' I:irst C'lass at Manthani. \ 2. Ileard Mr'. Eturi Kalyan Kumar, lear r ed cottnscl leprcsenting i\4r. N4ohd. Moin Ahn. red Icr ned coutrscl Quadri, ) : ( lol the pctitioner and Mr. N4. Rarnachandra I{: Id1 , lcarned ) ) Additional PLrblic l'rosccutor' lbl respondent No.
I c 2 - ) I'hough the criminal petition was filed scckirg lo quash the procccdings in I). V. C. No. l I ol 1025, Ie. arttecl cotrtrsel tirr the pctitionet' r'cstlictcd [ris pla1 c1 rec]Llcstillq this Cotrlt to clispctlsc rvith the appearance ol the petitiorler. rcsponcle rrt No. l in l). V. C. No. ll o1'2025. on the filc ol leanred [)r'irrcrlla[ . lLrdicial Magistrate of First Class at Manthani. otl thc groLttrcl tlrat thc petitioner is aged about 71 ycars u' llo is strt'tcrirrg lionl old-agc luilmcnts. '[-he 1. learrred Additiorrat Public I'rosccLttrrt' h:ts rrot opposcd the submission lnade by the learned counsel lor petitionet 5. ln view ol the above sttbmissions. :rucl rvithoLtt erPressiltg any opinion on the merits of the case. thc presc'rlce ol tlte petitioner/respondent No. 2 in D. V. C. No. l I of 2025. on thc llle o1' ('lass at Manthani' lcarned Principal Judicial Magistratc of FilsL is dispensed with, subject to thc . r. ,tt,111iorr that the petitioner/respondent No.
2 shall be represented bv his cot-trtsel on every date ofhearing, unless his presence is specifically leqLrilcd during the course of the trial. In the everlt of rlou-a;lpca ratrce ol petitioner/respondent No. 2 on any datc so fixccl b-"- thc trial ---- Clour-t. thc tr ial ('<ttrrt shall be entitled to pr-occcrl rt tlt thc nltttcr- in uccolclancc rr i1h lari 6 . \ccoldinslr'. rlrc cliruinal petition is dispos. -. 1 ol [)cncling rnisccllarre<tus applications, il lt, sltall st:urcl c lo se d SD/- N. CHrr JDRA SEKHAR RAO I EPUTY REGISTRAR t--7 ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1 The PrincrpalJudicial [\,4agistrate of First Class, Manthar 2. fwo CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Statc f Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3 One CC to Sri lr,4ohd Arloin Ahmed Quadri, Advocate IO: _JCl 4. Two CD Copies r\LlK r1'S L ,"ti HIGH COURT DATED: 2910112026 - ' .. 1! ! : in a. \) ORDER L) 0 rtB 20? 6 1- CRLP. No. 954 of 2026 ',. ,t' , ---,:'- .. - DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION pf \. \l ). \'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.