SHRI SALONG AO v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-03-22. SHRI SALONG AO v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC020001342024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Crl. )/8/2024 SHRI SALONG AO S/O SHRI TEMJENLIBA R/O CHANDMARI COLONY KOHIMA-797001 NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER Advocate for the Respondent : P. P, NAGALAND BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 22-03-2024 1. Heard Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. K. Angami, learned PP for the State. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant, Shri. Salong Ao, for correction of the cause title in Criminal Revision No. 2 of 2020. 3. Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the cause title in Criminal Revision No. 2 of 2020, it has been inadvertently mentioned as “impugned judgment and order dated 30-06-2014 passed by the Page No.
# 2/2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kohima, Nagaland by which the appellant was convicted under section 379 & 447 IPC” instead of Section 380 & 457 IPC, and, therefore, it is contended to allow this application and to make necessary correction in the cause title. 4. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsels for both sides, and I have gone through the petition and accordingly, the petition is allowed. 5. In the cause title of the petition, Section 380 and 457 be inserted in place of Section 379 & 447 IPC. 6. In view of the above, the interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.