V.A. JOSEPH v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-24. V.A. JOSEPH v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI TH WEDNESDAY, THE 24 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 30557 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 V. A. JOSEPH AGED 72 YEARS S/O ITTIYAVARA, VENNAYIPPILLIL HOUSE, VELLIPPALLY VILLAGE, VELLILAPPALLYKARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576. 2 THRESSYAMMA AGED 70 YEARS W/O JOSEPH, VENNAYIPPILLIL HOUSE, VELLIPPALLY VILLAGE, VELLILAPPALLYKARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576. BY ADV T. ANCY RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001. 2 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576. 3 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE PALA P O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686575. 4 VENUGOPAL AGED 58 YEARS NEDUMKARAYIL HOUSE, VELLILAPPALLYKARA, VELLIPPALLY VILLAGE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576.
5 OMANA VENUGOPAL AGED 53 YEARS W/O VENUGOPAL, NEDUMKARAYIL HOUSE, VELLILAPPALLYKARA, VELLIPPALLY VILLAGE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576. 6 AKHIL ANIL AGED 27 YEARS S/O VENUGOPAL, NEDUMKARAYIL HOUSE, VELLILAPPALLYKARA, VELLIPPALLY VILLAGE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686576. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24. 07. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 30557 OF 2021 JUDGMENT th Dated this the 24 day of July 2024 This writ petition is filed for seeking direction to respondents 2 and 3 to give adequate and effective Police protection to the lives and property of the petitioners and the threats caused by party respondents and others for the use of the pathway as mentioned in Ext. P1 order. 2. Though notice was sent from this Court to respondents 4 to 6, the same has been accepted and none appears. nd 3. On 23. 12.
2021 an order was passed directing the 2 respondent to ensure that the lives of the petitioners are given adequate protection from threats and intimidation from the party respondents. Therefore, the averments in the W. P. (C) stand unchallenged. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to allow this writ petition making the interim order absolute. The Writ Petition is allowed as above. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE saap WP(C) NO. 30557 OF 2021 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30557/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA NO. 2/2020 IN OS 240/2020 DATED 13/10/2020 Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA NO. 2/2020 IN OS NO. 240/2020 DATED 13. 10. 2020. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION AND THE DISPATCH REGISTER WHICH IS OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BY THE PETITION ON 27/11/2021. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15. 12. 2021. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 16. 12. 2021.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.