POOJA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-30. POOJA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2024:HHC:16643 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16365, 16473, 16478 of 2024 to 16484 of 2024 Decided on: 30. 12. 2024 CWP No. 16365 of 2024 Vijay Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16473 of 2024 Latesh Thakur and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16478 of 2024 Pooja and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16479 of 2024 Krishna Kumari and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16480 of 2024 Sanjeev Kumar and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16481 of 2024 Suman Kumari and others … Petitioners 2024:HHC:16643 Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16482 of 2024 Sunita Devi and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No.
16483 of 2024 Ravi Dutt … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents CWP No. 16484 of 2024 Akshay Shoshta and others … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner(s) : M/s Parul Negi and Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocates, for the petitioner(s) in all the petitions. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General in all the petitions. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the prayer made herein is squarely covered by the judgment passed by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.
2004 of 2017 alongwith connected matters, titled Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of H. P. and others, decided on 03. 08. 2023. He further submits that representations have also been made by the petitioners in this regard and it would be in the interest of justice, in case, these petitions are disposed of with the direction that let the representations of the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority, in terms of the averments made in the representations as well as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioners therein. 3. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, these petitions are disposed of with the direction that let the representations made by the petitioners shall be decided by the Competent Authority, in terms of the averments made therein, taking into consideration the judgments being relied upon by the petitioners therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from today. 4.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 30, 2024 (narender)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.