SMT.SUMAN W/O.SHRIKANTH KADAM v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-08-23. SMT.SUMAN W/O.SHRIKANTH KADAM v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 146165 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH RD DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 146165 OF 2020 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUMAN W/O SHRIKANTH KADAM, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, ST R/O: 1 CROSS, SHAHU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH. S. NARGUND. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VITTHAL. S. TELI. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, THEJASKUMAR N BELAGAVI, D. C. COMPOUND, Location: HIGH COURT OF BELAGAVI-590 001. KARNATAKA 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BAILHONGAL SUB-DIVISION, BAILHONGAL, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST:BELAGAVI-591 101. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, BELAGAVI, TALUK BELAGAVI-OLD CORPORATION BUILDING, RISALDAR GALLI, BELAGAVI-590 001. 5. KALLAPPA S/O KRISHNA KINEKAR, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, - 2 - WP No.
146165 of 2020 R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. 6. ARJUN S/O KRISHNA KINEKAR, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. 7. MONAPPA S/O KRISHNA KINEKAR, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. 8. SHIVAJI S/O KRISHNA KINEKAR, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. 9. PARASHURAM S/O HUVAPPA PATIL, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. 10. MARUTI S/O HUVAPPA PATIL, AGE: NOT KNOWN, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANGRALI K. H. , TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - WP No. 146165 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri. Santosh D. Nargund. , learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Vitthal S. Teli.
, for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 14. 09. 2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again the petition was listed on 29. 10. 2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the petition was listed on 11. 06. 2024 on that day, two weeks time was granted to rectify the objections raised by the registry. Despite granting several opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections for the fourth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite granting sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2020.
Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost - 4 - WP No. 146165 of 2020 four years. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN LIST NO. : 2 SL NO. : 11
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.