Skip to main content
LawSphereX

KARAM SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-11-03. KARAM SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17066/2025 Decided on: 03. 11. 2025 Karam Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. . …Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. M. A. Safee, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Petitioner seeks benefits of the decision rendered in 2 Satya Devi Vs. State of H. P. and others. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the 2 judgment in Satya Devi’s case has been assailed by the respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20496/2024. The common decision passed in several other matters connected with Satya Devi’s case has also been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes CWP No.

2274 of 2021 and connected matters. decided on 28. 05. 2024 Vs. Inder Pal . Copy of an order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 24. 03. 2025 in several connected Special Leave Petitions with lead 3 case State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal was perused which reads as under:- “1. Delay condoned. 2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters. 3. Tag alongwith SLP© No. 20496/2024. 4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed. ” In view of the fact that operation of impugned order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28. 05. 2024) in all connected Special Leave Petition has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that benefits, if any, 2 flowing to the petitioner under Satya Devi’s case, shall abide by the 3 outcome of the Inder Pal’s case instituted by the respondents 2 against the common judgment rendered in Satya Devi’s case.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge rd 03 November, 2025(rohit) Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11306/2025

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.