S.Senthilkumar v. The State Human Rights Commission,
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. SUNDAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-06-17. S.Senthilkumar v. The State Human Rights Commission,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17. 06. 2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 and W. M. P. Nos. 4649 and 4651 of 2019 1. S. Senthil Kumar 2. L. Sathish Petitioners vs. 1. The State Human Rights Commission represented by its Registrar Thiruvarangam 143, P. S. Kumarasamy Raja Road Chennai 600 028 2. V. Ramamurthy Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 18. 12. 2018 made in SHRC. No. 526 of 2016 on st the file of the 1 respondent and quash the same. For petitioners No appearance For R1 Mr. S. Wilson Standing Counsel For R2 Mr. M. Selvarajan ORDER Page Nos. 1/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 [made by M. SUNDAR, J.
] Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing yesterday (16. 06. 2025) which reads as follows: 'W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 and W. M. P. No. 4651 of 2019 M. SUNDAR,J. , and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. , (Order of the Court was made by M. SUNDAR, J. ) There is no representation for writ petitioners either in the physical Court or on VC (video conferencing) platform (to be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a regular/routine/daily feature in this Court) but learned standing counsel for R1 (SHRC) is before us. 2. With the intention of giving opportunity to writ petitioners and learned counsel for writ petitioners, list this matter again on 17. 06. 2025 but under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'. (M. S,J. ) (H. C,J. ) 16. 06. 2025' 2.
Pursuant to the aforesaid proceedings, captioned 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] and captioned 'writ miscellaneous petitions' [hereinafter 'WMPs' for the sake of brevity] are listed today under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'. Page Nos. 2/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 3. Mr. S. Wilson, learned Standing Counsel for R1 and Mr. M. Selvarajan, learned counsel for R2, are before us but there is no representation for writ petitioner today also either in the physical Court or on the VC platform (To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing which is a regular/routine/daily feature in this Court). 4. Sequitur is captioned WP and captioned WMPs are dismissed for default/nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. (M. S. , J. ) (H. C. , J. ) 17. 06. 2025 cad Page Nos. 3/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 M. SUNDAR, J. and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
cad To The Registrar State Human Rights Commission Thiruvarangam 143, P. S. Kumarasamy Raja Road Chennai 600 028 W. P. No. 4142 of 2019 17. 06. 2025 Page Nos. 4/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.