PARESH BORO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-11. PARESH BORO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010159342020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. /2455/2020 PARESH BORO S/O. SRI BHUK CHANDRA BORO, VILL. KATAHBARI, KALIPATH, P. S. GORCHUK, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781035. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T SOM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN :: O R D E R :: 11-12-2020 By this application under Section 439 Cr. P. C. , the accused-petitioner, namely, Paresh Boro has sought for bail in connection with Gorchuk Police Station Case No. 576/2020, registered under Sections 120(B)/406/381 of IPC. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State. Also perused the case diary and the materials on record.
As per FIR certain mobile phone that directed to be delivered by the informant, namely, Inskart Services Private Limited was found missing. The present petitioner is a driver under the said company and the case diary reveals that the petitioner was asked to drive the vehicle by another employee, Prabhat, accordingly the petitioner drove the vehicle and Prabhat delivered the articles. The petitioner was arrested on doubt Page No. # 2/2 but nothing was recovered from him. The petitioner also sworn an additional affidavit to submit that he has a son aged about 8 months and is suffering from serious illness and his wife being the unemployed lady having no source of income facing extreme difficulty in the treatment his son and there is no one to take care. Taking note of all above and also the length of detention since (21. 10. 2020), the present accused petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail in connection with the case aforementioned on furnishing an amount of Rs.
20,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the CJM, Kamrup(M). In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.