HARIOM v. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2020-12-01. HARIOM v. State of U.P. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39918 of 2020 Applicant :- Hariom Opposite Party :- State of U. P. Counsel for Applicant :- Paritosh Sukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G. A. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. By means of this application, the applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 160 of 2020 under Sections 2/3 of U. P. Gangster & Antisocial Activities (Prevention), Act, 1986 Police Station Lodha District Aligarh is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that in the gang chart three cases have been shown against the applicant and in paragraph 10 of the affidavit to the bail application two other cases have been disclosed other than the gang-chart. Learned counsel further submits that in all the cases applicant has already been granted bail, copy of the bail orders have been brought on record as annexure No. 3 to the affidavit.
Applicant is languishing in jail since 08. 09. 2020. Learned A. G. A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he does not dispute the fact that applicant has been granted bail in the cases mentioned in the gang-chart. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U. P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed. Let the applicant Hariom be released on bail in Case Crime No. 160 of 2020 under Sections 2/3 of U. P.
Gangster & Antisocial Activities (Prevention), Act, 1986 Police Station Lodha District Aligarh on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr. P. C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr. P. C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. (v) The party shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vi) The computer generated copy of this order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned. (vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of this computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. (viii) In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 1. 12. 2020 Shekhar Digitally signed by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal Date: 2020. 12. 01 16:50:50 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.