Smt. Banoth Sunitha v. Shri. Gowtham Potru, (IAS)
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-13. Smt. Banoth Sunitha v. Shri. Gowtham Potru, (IAS). Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
I [ 3168 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD OF DECEMBER FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY FOUR TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN THE HONOURABLE SRI 2024 CONTEMPT CASE NO :1879 oF ContemptCaseunderSectionsl0to12ofContemptofCourtsActl9Tlto willful disobedience and for non-compliance prni"f,if'e i"siondent herein for their W'P' 9264 of Court order dated 10'04 2024 in No' [i tf,e oro"r oi tus Hon'uL 2024 Between: years, Wo. Late BanothRavi, Aged. 37 occ, L. abqul 1. Smt. Banoth Sunitha' R/o. H. No. s+t, ouniigai-id"d;' Gandimalsamma Dundigal Mandal' Medchal-Malkajigiri District. 2. Smt. Banoth Anitha, wo. Late Banoth Mohan, Aged. 51 years' occ. Labo. ut' R/o. H. No. s+t, ourtis;'Th;il;: cinaih'isamma- Dundigal Mandal' Medchal-Malkajigiri District. ... PETITIONERS AND Shri. Gowtham Potru, (lAS), The District Collector' Medchal-Malkajgiri District' ... RESPONDENT/CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl.
AKKAM ESHWAR Counsel forthe Respondent: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I K' LAI(SHMAN SRI JUSTICE HON'BI,E 20. 24 No . 1a79 of co ORDER: ThisContemptCaseisfiledalleglngwillfutand in |O'O4'2O24 of order' dated violation deliberate order' this Court the aforesaid 4 of 2O24'Vide W. P. No. 926 l petition directing respondent No'3 to of the writ disposed considertheonlineapplications,dated24. |1. 2023 orders appropriate and pass the petitioners submitted by eight (8) weeks a period of wit}j law within in accordance order' of the said of from the date receipt I dated O6' l2'2O24'Ms with the order' 2.
tn compliance I I for I Government Pleader Sravanthi, learned Assistant 05'12'2024 of proceedings' dated produced' Revenue has that it is stated Divisional Oflicer' wherein' the Revenue of the for issuance petitioners made by the the request were also Reasons was rejected' pass books E-pattadar proceedings The copy of the said specihcally mentioned' for the petitioners' to the learned counsel is furnished \ C. C. No. l879 of 2ir. \ + who seeks liberty from this Court to challenge the same. The said proceedings are placed on record. 3. In the light of the same, nothing remains in the present Contempt Case to adjudicate further. Accordingly, tJ:is Contempt Case is closed. Liberty is granted to tJ:e petitioner to challenge the proceedings, dated 05. 12. 2024 of the Revenue Divisional Officer. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel ttrereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. Sd/- I.
NAGA LAKSHMI -DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTI ON OFFICER To, ESHWAR' AdVOCAIE [OPUC] One CC tO SRI. AKKAM 1 the State of Telangana' Two CCs to AGP FOR REVENUE' High Court for 2 lourl 3. Two CD Copies $ I I I HIGH COURT DATED: 1311212024 ! -. - S TA i 1tl ( \ J 19 ttB ? |l)i \ ORDER CC. No. 1879 of 2024 CC IS CLOSEI] @o*'o W
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.