Madhu Sudhan Wadde v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-11. Madhu Sudhan Wadde v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
r- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEI4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ' CRL. P. NO: 6522OF 2O2O Between: Madhu Sudhan Wadde, S/o. Ramachandrudu Petitioner/Accused No. 1 AND t The State of Telangana, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad ..... Respondent _... Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P. C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the S. H,O. Shantinagar Police Station, Gadwal District, to release the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. B7l2020 of Shantinagar Police Statlon, Gadwal District, in the interest of justice.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shafath Ahmef Khan, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public f-rosecutor for the respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER u TI,]I,E HON'BLE JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6522 of 2O2O ORDERT This application is filed seeking anticipatory bail. The petitioner is Al in Crime No. 87 of 2019 of Shantinagar Police Station, Gadwzti District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perlrsed the record. The marrizrge of the petitioner with the de complainant facto was performed on 20. 10. 2019. Thereafter, it appeals that matrimonial dis,putes arose between them and negotiations were held in the prese nce of elders. The said fact was mentioned in the complaint dated 20. 05. 2020.
It appears that the petitioner and the ,, 2"d respondent have entered into an agreement dated 20. 10. 2019. The petitioner has filed copy of the said agreement. In the said agreement, it is specifically mentioned that there are disputes between the pet,itioner and the de and there is facto complainant incompatibility Lretween them. In the agreement, it is specifically mentioned that they have decided to obtain divorce with mutual consent. In the r:omplaint, the said facts are suppressed, by the de complainan /acto t. Consideri:-rg the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bai. to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Shantinagar Police Station, Gadwal District, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petition S executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.
5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to his satisfaction. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed. \ SD/- I. NAGA I-AKSHMI ASSISTAN'T ITIi,GI coPY ll //TRUE O FFICER SECTION I -to at Alampur '- -n" First class Magistrate ,. ludicial Gadwal District Station' '--ntinag a r Police off't"''-Sha 2' The Station (OUT)-"-at Hyderabad ''ou'" High Court publlc Prosecutor' CCs to the 3' Two (OPUC) Advocate ---to Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan' 4. One CC coPY' 5. One sPare ----r a HIGH COURT KL,J /, ,s a) ! u . , _$*# I DATED: tl. l2. z[tz0 \ -s"/ . :Y'. 4 . :) y9/ ORDER: CRLP. NO: 6522 ctf 2O2O BAIL
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.