JYOTIRMOY CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-05-02. JYOTIRMOY CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010030942013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2421/2013 JYOTIRMOY CHOUDHARY S/O LATE CHITTRANJAN CHOUDHURY, R/O 2ND LINK ROAD, BYE LANE NO. 11, HOUSE NO. 22, SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ITS COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY-37 3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM 4:THE JT. DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY-3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNRD Page No. # 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 02. 05. 2024. None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Shri CS Hazarika, learned State Counsel, Assam and Shri P Handique, learned counsel representing the Panchayat and Rural Development (P&RD) Department, Assam are present.
This Court has noticed that there has been continuous non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner and on the last date i. e. 30. 04. 2024, the following order was passed: “None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Ms. J. Bora, learned counsel representing the P & RD Department is present. A similar situation was there on the last occasion also when the matter was listed on 22. 02. 2024. In the interest of justice, a further opportunity is granted to the petitioner to make representation. List this case on 02. 05. 2024. It is however made clear that in case of further non-representation, this Court would pass appropriate orders as this matter is of the year 2013. ” In view of the aforesaid situation, this Court is left with no other alternative but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE Page No. # 3/3 Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.