Skip to main content
LawSphereX

THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ST DEVELOPMENT BOARD and ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS.

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-09. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ST DEVELOPMENT BOARD and ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010039152017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5554/2017 THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ST DEVELOPMENT BOARD and ANR. MORIGAON, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY, SRI KAMESWAR PATAR. 2: KAMESWAR PATAR S/O. LT. NARESWAR PATAR R/O. VILL. NAOKHWLA P. O. and P. S. JAGIROAD DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WPT and BC DEPTT. , DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DY. SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE JT. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE DIRECTOR WPT and BC DEPTT. ASSAM GUWAHATI Page No. # 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : WP(C)/5553/2017 THE PIC ITDP BOARD and ANR. SADIYA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY SHRI PURNA KANTA DEORI. 2: PURNA KANTA DEORI S/O. LT. KORKESWAR DEORI R/O. VILL. KAPOUPHAUTARI DEORI GAON P. O.

CHAPAKHAWA SADIYA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. REP. BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DY. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE DIRECTOR WPT and BC DEPTT. Page No. # 3/3 ASSAM GUWAHATI. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A B T HAQUE Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. : Advocate , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 09-12-2020 Shri A. B. T Haque, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Shri R. Dhar, learned counsel is present for the WPT & BC Department. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.