Gaddam Nagamani v. The state of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: SHAMEEM AKTHER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-22. Gaddam Nagamani v. The state of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AHD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEI\I BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION NO: 21900 OF 2020 Between: Gaddam Nagamani, W/o. Sri Yadaiah, Aged about. 38 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. GaddamvariYadavalli Village, Kangal Mandal, Nalgonda District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The state of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary ( Revenue) Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda a The Thahasildar, Kanagal Village and l\,4andal, Nalgonda District. 4. The Special Dy. Collector ( LAO), LA Unit-ll, Srisailam Left Bank Canal, Nalgonda District ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or orders more particularly in the nature of l\rlandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent in seeking to delete name of the petitioner from the revenue records in respect of the agricultural property to an extent of Ac. 2-00 gts forming part of Sy. No. 356/1 , situated at Gaddamvari Yedavalli village, Kanagal Mandal, Nalgonda District and taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from the said land, as illegal, unjust and violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps for removal of name of the petitionbr from the revenue records in respect of the said land and not to dispossess or disturb peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent not to take any coercive steps including deletion of the name of the petitioner from the revenue records and dispossesses in respect of the agricultural property to an extent of Act-00 gts forming part of Sy. No. 356/1 , situated at Gaddamvari Yedavalli Village, Kanagal l\,4andal, Nalgonda District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE DT, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No. 219OO of 2O2O ORDER Heard both sides and perused the record. 2.
Having argued for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition wlth a liberty to work out the remedies before appropriate authority in accordance with law. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and Iiberty is granted as sought for. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY/i \ SECTION OFFICER To, V. Hari Haran Advocate [OPUCI 1 . One CC to Sri ^ 2 Twoccs to GP ror ne'eli" fr[[c;;tti"' iGltate of relanqana [ouT] of Telangana Hign Court for the State 3 Two CCs to the Cp to|. f-,iO'Ac'q'itiion (our) 4. Two CD CoPies PIV $. r HIGH COURT DATED:2211212020 S TA o I 2021 4 U $,tl o 0 ORDER 'k WP. No. 21900 of 2020 Dismissing the WP as withdrawn Without costs. tv
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.