NARENDRA KUMAR SONI v. MADHYA PRADESH PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-05. NARENDRA KUMAR SONI v. MADHYA PRADESH PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA th ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 2382 of 2024 BETWEEN:- NARENDRA KUMAR SONI S/O MADANLAL SONI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE (RETIRED) 16 MAHAVEER NAGAR DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI DHEERAJ SINGH PANWAR - ADVOCATE) AND 1. MADHYA PRADESH PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR G. P. H. COMPOUND POLO GROUND, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (INDORE REGION) M. P. PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD. G. P. H. COMPOUND POLOGFOUND, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER M. P. PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD. OPP. 132 KV GRID, BHOPAL ROAD, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER By the instant petition, the petitioner is claiming that although he stood retired on 30. 06.
2016 and the annual increment was to be added on 1st of July of that year, but he was not granted the said benefit. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case has already been settled by the Supreme Court recently in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 (The Director {Admn. and HR KPTCK and Ors. Vs. C. P. Mundinamani & Ors. ) wherein it has been held that benefit of annual increment which was to be added on 1st of July every year shall be paid to the employee who got retired on 30th of June of the said year, therefore, the present petitioner is also entitled to get the said benefit. 3. Considering the aforesaid and taking note of the judgment passed by Supreme Court in case of C. P. Mundinamni (Supra), this petition is allowed, directing the respondents to grant the benefit of annual increment which was to be added with effect from 01. 07.
2016 and recalculate the benefit of retiral dues and pension and issue fresh PPO in favour of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of submitting copy of this Court. 4. With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed (PRANAY VERMA) JUDGE jyoti
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.