Mr. Manish Kumar v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-30. Mr. Manish Kumar v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 36693 OF 2024 Between: years, lvlr. Manish Kumar, S/o. Late Mahavir Pershad, Aged about 54 Occ: Business, Ri/o. H. No. 21- 7- 110, Mama Jamila Devdi, Hyderabad .. ,PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 2. The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendamagar Division, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation dated 12. 07 . 2024 and in not restoring the name of the Petitioner and his family members in the revenue records as per the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W. P. Nos. 245OG ot 2OOB, 24525 and 28272 of 2008 and in W. A. Nos' 408, 439, 442, 542, 543, 623 and 649 of 2011 as illegal, arbitrary' and unconstitutional and consequently direct. the Respondents to restore the names of the Petitioner and his family members/predecessors as reflected in the revenue records prior to the order dated 22. 05.
2007 passed by the Respondent No 3' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation dated 12. 07. 2024 of the Petitioner forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHALLA APOORVA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY UIRIT PETITION No. 36693 of2024 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following reliel- "... to issue a wi| order or a direction, partianlartg one in the nature of o wit of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 12. 07-2024 and in not restoring the name ol the petitioner and his familA members in the reuenue records a-s per the orders of this Hon'bte Court in W. P. Nos. 245O6 of 2008, 24525 qnd 28272 of 2008 and in W. A. Nos.
408, 439, 442, 542, 543, 623 and 649 of 2011 os illegat' arbitrary, ond unconstitutional and consequenttA direct the respondents to reslore the names of the petitioner and his familg members/ predecessors as reflected in the reuenue records pior to the order dated 22. 05. 2007 passed by the responderi No. 3 and przss anA other order or orders @s this Hon'ble Court mag deem fit in th" cv(unstonc"s ol lhe ca. se". 2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 3. It is stated that the grandfather of the petitioner has purchased property to an extent of Acs. 7. 05 gts. , in Sy. No. l of Darga Hussain Shahwali village, and an extent of Acs. 2. 14 gts. , and Acs. O. 3S gts. , in Sy. Nos. 332 and 333 of Shai[pet Village, and Ac. 1. 13 gts. , in Sy. No. l O of Raidurg Vlllage uide Sale Deed bearing Document No. 249O of 7964 dated 02. 09. 1964.
It is further stated that when the names of the petitioner's predecessors in-interest were deleted from the pahanies on the orders of respondent No. 3, the petitioner was constrained to hle a revision on the file of the CVBR, J wP_36691 2021 Joint Colle,:tor under Section 9 of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattarlzrr pass Books Act, l9Z7,who in turn dismissed the said revision ula,e orders dated 1g. lO. 2OOg. It is further stated that aggrieved b. r the said orders, the petitioner filed W. p. No. 24506 of 2008 on thr: file of this Court, and the same was allowed, against which the ljtate also filed appeal urde W. A. No. 4OS of 2O 1 1 and Batch, wher,:in the Honble Division Bench of this Cour. t confirmed the orders passed by the learned Single Judge.
The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the same, the respondents are not taking any l;teps to restore the entries that stood prior to the amendmenl s being carried out rn terms of the orclers of the Revenue Divi,sional Officer. 4. As it is stated that the writ petition filed by the petitioner was allowed against the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 22. 05. 21007 and the same was conhrmed by the Drvision Bench of this Court, this Court, without expressing any <ipinion on the merits ol' ,_he case, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to make an approprjate online appiication in Dharani portal seeking to restore the entriers as they stood prior to 22. O5. 2OO7, rn accordance with the provisions of ROR Act, 9 cf 2O2O.
In the event of said appiication being submitted by trre petitioner, the respondents are directed 1,o restore 3 CVBR, J wP 36693 2024 the entries as they stood prior to the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 22. 05. 2OO7 . 5, The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs. SD/- N. SRI RI ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, The State of Telangana, HYderabad 2. The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendarnagar Divison, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 5. One CC to Sri Challa Apoorva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 7.
Two CD CoPies T J/BN e I HIGH GOURT CC TODAY DATED:3011212024 :\ ,-,; r:,4- ORDER 7- . $' P "+ WP. No. 36693 of 2024 o u- ttuo ,Ll . ),: s ai DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS V
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.