SARDA ENERGY AND MINERALS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY AGRAWAL,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2025-04-04. SARDA ENERGY AND MINERALS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 243 of 2023 1 - Sarda Energy And Minerals Limited Having Its Office At Industrial Growth Centre, Siltara, Raipur (C. G. ) 493111 Through Its Authorised Signatory CHANDRAKANT Mr. Ashish Mishra, Aged About 44 Years, S/o Shri P. P. Mishra, R/o House No. 135, Sanskar City, Dhansuli, Raipur (C. G. ). Pin-493111, Presently Working As Deputy Manager Legal. CHANDRAKANT ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan (C-Wing), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110001. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Mineral Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Atalnagar, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Collector, District - Narayanpur. 4 - District Mining Officer, District – Narayanpur. 5 - Director, Directorate Of Geology And Mining, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Regional Head, Directorate Of Geology And Mining, Regional Office Jagdalpur, Vijay Bhawan, In Front Of Commissioners Office, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent No. 1/UOI : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Govt. Counsel. For Respondents No. 2 to 6/ : Mr. Ranbir Singh Marhas, Addl. Advocate State General appears alongwith Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Govt. Advocate. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order On Board 04/04/2025 1) The matter is listed in default for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court on 23/04/2024, yet no one appears on behalf of the Petitioner. 2) Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. -Sd/- -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Chandrakant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.