NAVAL KISHORE MEENA v. SMT. APARNA ARORA
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-04. NAVAL KISHORE MEENA v. SMT. APARNA ARORA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:6950] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Writ Contempt No. 361/2021 1. Naval Kishore Meena S/o Ganga Ram Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Hanoti Post Thanawad, Tehsil Aklera, District Jhalawar. (Presently Posted As Teacher Grade Iii (Level-I) At Gps, Bhagwanpura, Peeo Daulpura, P. s. Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara) 2. Ratti Ram Jangid S/o Sita Ram Jangid, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Vazeerpura, Ward No. 03, Tehsil And District Tonk. (Presently Posted At Gps Rojya, Peeo Borkhedi Gujran, Block Aklera, District Jhalawar) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Aparna Arora, Secretary, Education Department Of Education, State Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Shri Saurabh Swami, The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Shyam Lal Sangawat, Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer. 4. Hajari Lal Shivhare, Joint Director, School Education, Kota. 5.
Mohammad Tahseen Ali Khan, District Education Officer, Elementary, Bhilwara. 6. Ram Chandra Bairwa, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara. 7. Purushotam Maheshwari, District Education Officer, Elementary, Jhalawar 8. Ramjeevan Meena, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar. 9. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Education Department Government Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Dadhich for Mr. Hanuman Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JD:6950] (2 of 2) [WCP-361/2021] JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 04/02/2025 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners have alleged the non-compliance of the order dated 19. 01. 2021 passed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to apprise the Court with certitude as to whether the petitioners’ request for mutual transfer has been acceded to or not. 3. The order under consideration was passed way back on 19. 01.
2021 and four years have since passed; yet no cognizance has been taken so far. 4. The contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of. 5. Needless to observe that if any of the petitioners’ grievance still persist, they shall be free to apply for revival of the present contempt petition. (DINESH MEHTA),J 24-Arun/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.