URMIL KUMARI v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2020-11-24. URMIL KUMARI v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 211 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU SWP No. 1580/2010 (O & M) (Through Video Conferencing) Urmil Kumari . …Petitioner(s) Through: None v/s State of J&K and others …. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Seema Shekhar, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE ORDER 01. The petitioner had filed the present petition praying for the following reliefs: “directions in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and offer her appointment as Rehbar-e-Taleem teacher on post no. 2 advertised vide advertisement notice dated 18. 02. 2008 (Annexure-C) in the then Government primary School Paddian (now upgraded as Government Middle School Paddian) of Village Jib, Zone Tikri strictly as per her merit in the panel submitted by the respondent No. 3 and 4 to the respondent No. 2. ” 02. Notice in the petition was issued on 09. 08.
2010 and the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with the provisions of law. Thereafter the matter was never 2 SWP No. 1580/2010 pursued by either of the parties. Even the objections have not been filed by the respondents. 03. As the hearing of the cases now is being conducted through video conferencing, the required link for joining the video conferencing is being circulated amongst all the lawyers. Besides this, the Bench Secretary/Reader are forwarding the link to all the Advocates, who contact them one day prior to the listing of their cases. For which specific note is being published in the Cause List. But despite this, counsel for the parties have not shown any interest. 04. For the reasons mentioned above, apparently nothing survives in the present petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. However, with liberty to the petitioner to get the same revived in case the cause still survives. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 24.
11. 2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No VIJAY KUMAR 2020. 12. 01 11:48 I agree to specified portions of this document
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.