SRI. MANJUNATHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: E.S.INDIRESH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-06-17. SRI. MANJUNATHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 4708 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 4708 OF 2024 (SCST) BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O SRI THIMARAYAPPA RESIDING AT NO. 1 BANDENA AGRAHARA 1ST CROSS BAYAPANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560033. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMAKRISHNA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR - 563101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB DIVISION KOLAR - 563101. 4. SMT. PARVATAHMMA W/O SRI SRINIVAS - 2 - WP No. 4708 of 2024 AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NEELAKANTA AGRAHARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563130. 5. SMT. SRIDEVI D/O SRI SRINIVAS AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NEELAKANTA AGRAHARA VILLAGE KASBA HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563130. 6. SMT.
MADAVI D/O SRI SRINIVAS AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NEELAKANTA AGARAHARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563130. 7. SRI SRIKANTH S/O SRI SRINIVAS AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NEELAKANTA AGARAHARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563130. 8. SRI SRINIVAS @ MURAASRINIVAS S/O SRI RAMAPPA AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT NO. 115 NEAR VENKATARAMANA TEMPLE IMMDHALLI BENGALURU - 560066. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) - 3 - WP No. 4708 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28/09/2022 IN PTCL/07/2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 PRODUCED HEREIN AS ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
On the last date of occasion, this court has granted four weeks time to comply with the office objection, with a condition that, if petitioner fails to do so, the present petition would be liable to be dismissed. Till today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance. SD/- (E. S. INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No. : 1 Sl No. : 4
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.