PEELU NAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. PEELU NAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38145] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10357/2026 CNR: RJHC010785412026 | URN: CRLMB / 22667U / 2026 Peelu Nat S/o Omprakash, Aged About 33 Years, Jhuggi Jhopadi, Samtanagar, Police Station Beechhwal, District Bikaner, Presently Residing At Jhuggi Jhopadi, Ajadnagar Chakgarbi, Police Station Muktaprasad Nagar, District Bikaner. (Presently Lodged In Bikaner Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 10/08/2026 This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 198/2026 registered at Police Station Muktaprasad Nagar, District Bikaner, for offences under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is 6. 50 gm Heroine which is below commercial quantity. Antecedents of the petitioner are clear as there is no case registered against the petitioner under NDPS Act. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in behind the bars since 21. 07. 2026 and the trial of the case will [2026:RJ-JP:38145] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10357/2026] take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. This Court has considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record. The contraband recovered from the petitioner is 6. 50 gm Heroine which is below commercial quantity. Antecedents of the petitioner are clear as there is no case registered against the petitioner under NDPS Act. The petitioner is in behind the bars since 21. 07.
2026. Hence, keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case; conclusion of the trial of the case is likely to take time; the narcotic contraband alleged to be recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity; the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Peelu Nat S/o Omprakash arrested in connection with FIR No. 198/2026 registered at Police Station Muktaprasad Nagar, District Bikaner, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.
50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that [2026:RJ-JP:38145] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10357/2026] court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J 141/Mayank Chouhan
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.