SANTOSH BHEANSAL v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-04. SANTOSH BHEANSAL v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 34654 of 2025 Santosh Bheansal ..... Petitioner Mr. J. Sahu, Advocate State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 04. 12. 2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ shall not be issued directing the Opposite Parties compensation and rent for the land area of Ac. 0. 82 decimals pay the of Plot No. 992 and 993, Khata No.
121, Mouza: Bhengarajpur, Tahasil: Paikmal, District: Bargarh on which the opposite parties have constructed a Ashram School and also directing the Opposite Parties to pay the rent, And in the event the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause makes the rule absolute, Page 1 of 2. pass any other appropriate order/orders, direction/directions, writ/writs as deem fit and proper, And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound, ever pray” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.
2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Subrat Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 04-Dec-2025 18:27:30 Page 2 of 2.
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.