Skip to main content
LawSphereX

M. Gopal Reddy v. The State of Telangana,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-25. M. Gopal Reddy v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 32s5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENW FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 32932 OF 2024 Between: 1. M. Gooal Reddv, S/o late Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 83 years, Occu' Aqricuiture, Rl/o-Pangal Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 2. MI Janardhan Reddy, S/o late Ramachandra Reddy' Aged ab-out 79 years, Occu. Agriculture, R/b Pangal Village and lVland-al, Wanaparthy District ^ 3. tt/. Ivlanemma, W/o late Umapathi Reddy' Aged about 61 years, (Jccu' Housewife, Rlio Flat No. 201, Parimala Apartments, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad - 44. 4. Ml Bhaskar Reddy, S/o late Loka Reddy, Aged about 53 years, Occu' Aoriculture. Fl/o Pahqal Villaqe and [V1andal, Wanaparthy District. 5. MI Damodar Reddi, S/o late Loka Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occu. Agriculture, Fl/o Pangal Village and [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1.

The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings' Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. 2. The District Collector, Wanaparthv District. 3. The Tahsildar-cum- Sub Registrai, Panagal [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. pI 4. P. Narayanamma, Wo Ram Reddy, Aged about 61 Occu' Lears, Housewife, Fl/o Chennur Village, Gopalpet Mandal, WanaparthyDistrict . . . years, Occu. Welder, 5. Balakrishna Reddy, Sio late Sai Reddy, Aged about 42 District. Rl/o Chennur Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy 6. Srinivas Reddy, S7o'late Sai ReOdy, about-4l years, Occu. Welder, Fl/o -Rged District. Chennur Villaje, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy years, occu. Housewife, Fl/o z. inandra1ala,blb tat'e Sai Reddy, Aged a6out 39 Chennur Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy District. years, B. Bhagyamma,-Oio tate Sai Reddy, W/o Ram- Reddy' Aged about. 46 Occi. Agriculture, Rl/o Chenndr Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy District. about 9. Laiithamma, D/o late Sai Reddy, W/o M. Bhaskar Reddy' .

agqQ . 44 years, Occu. Housewife, Rl/o Ch6nnur Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 71 years, Occu' 10. kondamma, Wo late Damodar Reddy' Aged about . Fl/o Housewife, Chennur Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanapartly Diskict ^ 56 y-ears, Occu' 11. Nagi Rediiy, S/o late Dariodar Reddy, Aged about -Rl/o - Aor]culture. Chennur Villaqe, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy District' 70 years, Occu 12. Rl Bucharirma. W/o late Chinna Reddy, Aged about Housewife, Rl/o Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. l3. Pothula Ramachandramma, Wo late P. Sudershan Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occu. Housewife, Ryo Thatiparthy Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 14. A. Kistamma, Wo late Subba Reddv. Aged about 71 years, Occu. Housewife, R/o Dondapalli Village, Pangal Uandil, Wanaparthy Distrrct. 15. Kotla Shivamma, W/o Pulla Reddy, Aged about 81 years, Occu. Housewife, Rl/o Govardhanagiri Village, Weepinqahdla Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 16. K.

Venkat Ram Reddy, S/o Putla- Reddy, Aged about 58 years, Occu. Agriculture, Rl. /o Govardhanagiri Village, Weepangandla Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 herein in entertaining and registering sale deeds in respect of the lands to an extent of ( 1) 4c. 2. 16 guntas in Survey No 74lA, (2) Ac. 4. 05 guntas in Survey No:78/A, (3) Ac. 1. 08 guntas in Survey No. 78/A, (4) Ac. 0. 07 guntas in Survey No i87, (5) Ac. 1 . O7 guntas in Survey No. 242lA, (6) Ac. O. 17 guntas in Survey No. 244, (7) 4c. 2. 04 guntas in Survey No. 246144, (8) Ac. '1 . 36 guntas in Survey No. 246lEE, (9) Ac. 0. 06 guntas in Survey No. 252, (10) Ac. 4. 09 guntas in Survey No. 321 and (1 1 Ac. o.

12 guntas ) in Survey No. 339/A, in total Ac. 17 . 38 guntas, situated at Chikkepally Village, Pangal Mandal, Wanaparthy District, during the pendency of civil suits pending in various competent courts at Kollapur and Wanaparthy between the parties hereto, by considering the representation dated 1911012024 of the Petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and Consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 herein not to entertain any kind of alienations, transfers and charges by way of registered documents in respect of the total extent of Ac. 17. 38 guntas, situated at Chikkepally Village, Pangal Mandal, Wanaparthy District, till the final outcome of the civil suits pending between the parties hereto before the courts at Kollapur and Wanaparthy.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the Petitioners herein dated 1911012024 to the 3'd Respondent herein, the same was received in the office of the 3'd Respondent on 2111012024, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI KONDAPARTHI SRINIVASA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4to16:- The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR IUSTICE WRIT PETITION No. 32932 of 2024 ORDER Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks of this Court to withdraw irermission the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. 2.

In view of the same, permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscelianeous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs Sd/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ^n $ECTION OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to SRI KONDAPARTHI SRINIVASA, Advocate [OPUC] for the State of 2. ltwo CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration' High Court Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI 3. Two CD Copies BM NIP t, HIGH COURT DATED:2511112024 1 HE STA} € ( () 2 0 APff 2025 ORDER -a' WP. No. 32932 of 2024 \. Q I /t I fiu , J, DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.