Skip to main content
LawSphereX

DR. SHEIKH ARIF IQBAL S/O SHEIKH MOHD. ISHTHYAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-04. DR. SHEIKH ARIF IQBAL S/O SHEIKH MOHD. ISHTHYAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details...

Judgment text

[2024:RJ-JP:49796] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17635/2024 Dr. Sheikh Arif Iqbal S/o Sheikh Mohd. Ishthyak, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of D-1, Vivekanand Colony, Khetri House, Chandpole, Jaipur (Raj). 302016 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Rajasthan Medical Council, Through Its Registrar Having Its Office At Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur- 302001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Gholan Noorani for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi & Mr. Shubhendra Singh Deep for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Ram Singh Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 04/12/2024 1. This petition is filed seeking quashing of order dated 06. 11. 2024 passed by the Registrar, Rajasthan Medical Council-respondent No. 3.

2. Brief facts are that the petitioner was registered with Nepal Medical Council and thereafter the Medical Council of India registered the petitioner vide Certificate No. MCI/13-50852. The [2024:RJ-JP:49796] (2 of 2) [CW-17635/2024] Rajasthan Medical Council also registered the petitioner vide Registration No. RMC-33797. Vide order dated 06. 11. 2024, registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the Rajasthan Medical Council. 3. The grievance raised in the petition is that registration of the petitioner was cancelled without issuing show cause notice and opportunity of hearing. The cancellation of registration has serious consequences. The order having been passed in violation of principle of natural justice is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the respondent No. 3 to decide the issue afresh in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is allowed accordingly. 5. To avoid further delay and complications, let the petitioner appear before the respondent No. 3 on 06. 01.

2025 at 11:00 A. M. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/29

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.