THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. VIDHI KA ULANGHAN KARNE WALA BALAK R SARPARAST PITA
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-08. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. VIDHI KA ULANGHAN KARNE WALA BALAK R SARPARAST PITA. Read the...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI th ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 319 of 2024 BETWEEN:- THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION MOW DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANT (DR. ANJALI GYANANI- PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR THE APPELLANT/STATE ) AND 1. VIDHI KA ULANGHAN KARNE WALA BALAK R SARPARAST PITA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. VIDHI KA ULLANGHAN KARNE WALA BALAK P SARPARST PITA R/O DATIA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS This appeal coming on for admission this day, Justice Rohit Arya passed the following: ORDER Heard o n I. A. No. 262 of 2024, which is an application under Section 378(3) of Cr. P. C. moved on behalf of State seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal of respondents dated 18/10/2023 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), District Bhind (Madhya Pradesh) in Sessions Trial No. 98/2021.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD We have heard learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State. Signing time: 09-01-2024 01:19:10 PM We have also perused the impugned judgment. The conclusion of acquittal drawn in favour of respondents particularly, in view of paragraphs 13, 20 & 24 of the impugned judgment, appears to be reasonable and plausible based on proper appreciation of evidence. The judgment and the reasoning thereof, are not manifestly illegal or perverse to make out a case of miscarriage of justice. The judgment is impregnable as neither there is any illegality nor irregularity in the finding so recorded. Therefore, no compelling or substantial reasons for interference by this appellate Court and for grant of leave to appeal, are made out. Accordingly, I. A. No. 262 of 2024 is rejected. Consequently, present appeal stands dismissed.
(ROHIT ARYA) (BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI) JUDGE JUDGE ms/- Signature Not Verified Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD Signing time: 09-01-2024 01:19:10 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.