RAJU SHARMA v. RAJESH CHOUKSHEY
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. RAJU SHARMA v. RAJESH CHOUKSHEY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 341 of 2024 BETWEEN:- RAJU SHARMA S/O BABBAN SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEA R S , R/O QUARTER NO H 38 BARKATULLAH VISHWAVIDLYA, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY MS. PRIYANKA TIWARI - ADVOCATE) AND RAJESH CHOUKSHEY S/O CHOTELAL CHOUKSHEY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O SENIOR M. I. R. 343 KATARA HILLS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENT (BY SHRI HRITVIK DIXIT - ADVOCATE) This revision coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Applicant has filed an application i. e. I. A. No. 2058/2024 for condonation of delay in filing this criminal revision. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, I. A. No. 2058/2024 is allowed. Delay is condoned. 3. Criminal revision heard finally at motion stage. 4. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N. I.
Act, under Section 357(3) of Cr. P. C. and under Section 359 of Cr. P. C. and sentenced to undergo R. I. for 1 year, to pay an amount of Rs. 1,16,000/- as compensation, in default S. I. for 3 months and to pay Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signing time: 2/3/2024 1:06:38 PM Rs. 10,000/- as suit expenses respectively to the respondent. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the amount of cheque and compensation is paid to the complainant/respondent. 6. Counsel appearing for complainant submitted that he has accepted the amount of cheque as well as amount of compensation. He does not have any other grievance from the applicant. 7. It is jointly submitted by the counsel appearing for the parties that there is compromise between the parties, therefore, criminal revision be allowed. 8. Heard the counsel for the parties. 9. Offence in question is compoundable. Applicant has paid the amount to the complainant.
Counsel for the complaint on board submitted that amount has been paid and there is compromise between the parties. 10. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, criminal revision filed by applicant is allowed. Applicant is permitted to compound the offence. Applicant is acquitted from the said offences. 11. Certified copy as per rules. (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE sp/- Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signing time: 2/3/2024 1:06:38 PM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.