Skip to main content
LawSphereX

CITIZEN FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE AND 3 ORS. v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-03-13. CITIZEN FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE AND 3 ORS. v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details...

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010015652020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C) 1556/2020 1:CITIZEN FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE AND 3 ORS. REP. BY ITS SECY. TEESTA SETALVAD, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NIRANT BUNGALOW, JUHU TARA ROAD, MUMBAI- 400049. 2: ANIMA DEY W/O- KRISHNAPADA DEY R/O- VILL. ASHUDUBI PO AND PS KRISHNAI DIS GOALPARA PIN 783126. 3: NUR MAHAMMAD S/O- LT. IMAN ALI R/O- VILL. MOIRADHAJ P. O. ROWMARI BILL PS DHING PIN 782123. 4: NAMAN UDDIN S/O A HAFIZ R/O- BORBORI PO BELTOLA VIA CHAPARMUKH PS DHARAMTUL MORIGAON ASSAM PIN 782425 VERSUS 1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. Page No. # 2/3 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GHY. - 06. 3:THE COMM. AND SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM LEGISLATIVE DEPTT. LEGISLATIVE BRANCH DISPUR GHY. 06 4:THE HONOURABLE GAUHATI HIGH COURT REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL GHY.

-1. 5:THE NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 12/11 JAM NAGAR HOUSE REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECY. NEW DELHI- 11. 6:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY GAUHATI HIGH COURT CAMPUS REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECY. GHY. -1 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT. S. G. I. BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA ORDER 13. 03. 2020 Heard Mr. M. Desai, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Dutta, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, the learned Additional Senior Page No. # 3/3 Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 6, Ms. A. Gayan, the learned CGC for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. D. J. Das, the learned counsel on behalf of Mr. H. K. Das, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. On the submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, leave is granted to withdraw this writ petition and file a PIL keeping in view the cause pleaded in this writ petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal however, with the liberty to file a PIL on the same cause. This writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.