Bachcha Babu Rai @ Bacha Babu Ray v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-01. Bachcha Babu Rai @ Bacha Babu Ray v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66612 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -25 Year-2025 Thana- NADI P. S. District- Patna ====================================================== Bachcha Babu Rai @ Bacha Babu Ray, S/O Late Nank Rai @ Nanak Rai, Resident of Village - Pakki Dargah, P. S. - Nadi, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyamal Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 01-12-2025 Heard Mr. Shyamal Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Reverine (Nadi) P. S. Case No.
25 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 325, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B. N. S. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner and informant are agnates. They are having land Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 66612 of 2025(3) dt. 01-12-2025 2/2 dispute between them. There is also a counter version of this case. There is allegation of only one blow on the head of the informant whereas from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that three injuries are shown which is against the allegations. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26. 05. 2025. 5.
Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties st of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J. M. 1 Class, Patna City, Patna in connection with Reverine (Nadi) P. S. Case No. 25 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.