Gaddam Mamatha v. The state of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: SHAMEEM AKTHER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-22. Gaddam Mamatha v. The state of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No. 22061 oF 2020 Between: Gaddam l\4amatha, D/o. Late Srl Yadaiah, Aged about 27 yearc, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Chityal Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District ... PETITIONER AND I The State of Telangana, Represented by Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda 3 The Thahasildar, Kanagal Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. 4 The Special Dy. Collector (LAO), LA Unit-ll, Srisaitam Left Bank Canat, Nalgonda District ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or orders more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3'd respondent in seeking to delete name of the petitioner from the revenue records in respect of the agricultural property to an extent of Ac. 'l-00 gts forming part of Sy. No. 356/1 , situated at Gaddamvari Yedavalli Village, Kanagal Mandal, Nalgonda District and taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from the said land, as illegal, unjust and violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive for removal of name of the petitioner from the revenue records in respecl of the said land and not to dispossess or disturb peaceful possession and enJoyment of the property.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent not to take any coercive steps including deletion of the name of the petitioner from the Revenue Records and dispossesses in respect of the agricultural property to an extent of Ac. 1-00 gts forming part of Sy. No. 356/1 , situated at Gaddamvari Yedavalli Village, Kanagal I\,4andal, Nalgonda District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No. 22061 of 2O2O ORDER: Heard both sides and perused the record. 2.
Having argued for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to work out the remedies before appropriate authority in accordance with law. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and liberty is granted as sought for. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. V. Hari Haran, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two C. D. Copies Prk \ . j- HIGH COURT DATED:2211212020 ST4 BE 16' 2021 JAN d 04 { * * tF 9Esp. r. -rc ORDER WP. No. 22061 ol 2020 Dismissing the WP. as withdrawn without costs. "Sul @ ,
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.