SMT. ROSHNI SINHA ROY (RASAILY) v. SHRI SUVRANSHU SINHA ROY
Court: High Court of Sikkim
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI BISWANATH SOMADDER,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Sikkim judgment dated 2024-05-03. SMT. ROSHNI SINHA ROY (RASAILY) v. SHRI SUVRANSHU SINHA ROY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
COURT NO. 1 THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) ---------- --------------------------------------------------------- DIVISION BENCH: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mat. App. No. 01/2022 Smt. Roshni Sinha Roy (Rasaily), Wife of Sri Suvranshu Sinha Roy, Daughter of Shri Kiran Kumar Rasaily, Residing at Church Road, P. O. & P. S. – Gangtok, District – East Sikkim, Pin – 737101 ---------APPELLANT (S) VERSUS Shri Suvranshu Sinha Roy, IC-60824 Lieutenant Colonel, Son of Sudhanshu Sinha Roy, Permanent Resident of :- Barrakpore, P. O. Telinpara, P. S. Barrakpore, District – North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, Pin – 700121 And Presently Residing at:- IW Division, Senior Command Wing, Army War College, Mhow, P. O. – Mhow, P. S. – Kotwali, District – Indore, Pin – 453441.
----------RESPONDENT (S) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr. Abhinav Kant Jha and Ms. Preeti Basnett, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Sishir Mothay, Advocate for the respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 03/05/2024 JUDGMENT : (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) nd On 22 March, 2024, this Court had passed the following order: - “After hearing the learned Advocates for the parties, we are of the view that this is a matter which can be easily resolved through the process of Mediation. The parties have also agreed. As such, we appoint Ms. Sangita Pradhan, learned Advocate and the Deputy Solicitor General of India to mediate between the parties and try and resolve the issues on or before the next date. List this matter for further consideration under an rd appropriate heading on 03 May, 2024. ” Mat. App. No. 01/2022 COURT NO. 1 Smt.
Roshni Sinha Roy (Rasaily) vs Shri Suvranshu Sinha Roy Consequently, the learned Mediator mediated between the parties, holding four (4) sittings, which culminated being a success whereby the parties agreed to resolve their issues in terms of a Deed of Settlement entered into by and th between the parties on 30 April, 2024. Let the Deed of Settlement, which has been filed in the Court today, be kept on record. The Registry shall provide certified photocopies of the original Deed of Settlement to the parties forthwith. We wish to record our appreciation for the efforts taken by Ms. Sangita Pradhan, learned Advocate and the Deputy Solicitor General of India, who successfully mediated and resolved the issues amicably. We are also of the view that in the facts and circumstances of instant case, the learned Mediator is entitled to a remuneration, which is fixed at ₹30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only). This remuneration shall be borne by the parties, equally.
The Matrimonial Appeal, being Mat. App. No. 01/2022, stands disposed of accordingly. (Bhaskar Raj Pradhan) (Biswanath Somadder) Judge Chief Justice jk /bp/ami
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.