Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ANWAR v. STATE

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: DINESH MEHTA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-09-23. ANWAR v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10409/2020 Anwar S/o Remta Bhai, Aged About 38 Years, Village Gola, P. s. Bhanera, District Banaskatha (Gujrat). (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Bhinmal). ----Petitioner Versus State, Through P. p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Ranawat, through Jitsi Meet App For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 23/09/2020 This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Cr. P. C. in connection with FIR No. 15/2020, Police Station Jhab, District Jalore, for the offences under Sections 8/15 and 29 of NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case only because he happens to be the owner of the vehicle, from which contraband substance was recovered.

It is also submitted that the quantity in question was below commercial and the co-accused have been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 24. 03. 2020, 07. 04. 2020 and 14. 09. 2020. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute the aforesaid facts. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10409/2020] Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr. P. C. Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr. P. C. is allowed. The petitioner Anwar S/o Shri Remta Bhai, arrested in FIR No. 15/2020, Police Station Jhab, District Jalore, shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

Petitioner shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (DINESH MEHTA),J 29-skm/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.