MUNNIYA DEVI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-12-11. MUNNIYA DEVI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 18 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(WPC) No. 202 of 2024 In WP(C) No. 421 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11. 12. 2024 Smti. Munniya Devi W/o Shri. Kameshwar Roy R/o Lower Nongrim, Bihari Colony, Shillong – 793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya :::Applicant -Vs- 1. The Union of India represented by the Home Secretary/Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi – 110001 2. The Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi – 110001 3. The Director General Assam Rifles, (DGAR), Shillong, Meghalaya 4. The Colonel Records (Col Records), Directorate General Assam Rifles, Shillong, Meghalaya 5. The Deputy Commandant SO-2 (Adm), Directorate General Assam Rifles, Shillong, Meghalaya 6. The Mahanideshalaya Assam Rifles, Director General Assam Rifles, Pension/NE Record Branch, Shillong – 793001, Meghalaya 7. The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Desari Branch (Branch Code No.
2932), IFSC Code No. SBIN0002932, Vaishali, Bihar – 844504 8. Shri. Kameshwar Roy S/o Shri. Ramdeo Roy, R/o Village Khurd Madhul, P. O. Desari, District Vaishali, Bihar, PIN – 844504 :::Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Marpan, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. K. Gurung, Adv. (For R 1-6). i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Oral: This Misc. Application has been filed praying for directions to issue to the respondent authority not to release or disburse the pension benefits to the respondent No. 8, pending disposal of the writ petition. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner who is stated to be the legally wedded wife of the respondent No. 8, is before this Court in the connected writ petition, as the respondent No.
8 had submitted false information to the authority, with regard to marital status. As the main matter deserves further consideration, this Misc. Application is closed and the prayer made herein shall be taken up for further consideration, together with the main writ petition. Judge Meghalaya 11. 12. 2024 “D. Thabah-PS” Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by DARIHUN THABAH Date: 2024. 12. 11 17:57:56 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.