RISHIRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: KULDEEP MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. RISHIRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38223] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7280/2026 CNR: RJHC010814562026 | URN: CRLMP / 12590U / 2026 Rishiraj Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Parbhat Nagar Banar Jodhpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. State Bank Of India, Through Branch Manager Banar Bhopalgarh Road Near Railway Station Banar, Jodhpur,raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aidan Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “A. Direct Respondent No. 2 Bank to defreeze/unblock Bank Account No. 43708135935 (IFSC CODE: SBIN0032069) and allow all business and personal transactions, after keeping/marking a lien on the disputed amount of Rs. Rs. 43547/- (Rupees Fourty-three Thousand Five Hundred Fourty seven Only) only.
B. Pass any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. ” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the State Bank Of India (Respondent No. 2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance. [2026:RJ-JP:38223] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7280/2026] 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 244/Sonia
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.