Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ARTI PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-01. ARTI PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV st ON THE 1 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4234 of 2024 BETWEEN:- ARTI PRAJAPATI D/O SHRI HURGYAN PRAJAPATI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE, R/O LUDHAWALI, DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANT (BY SHRI FAISAL ALI SHAH - ADVOCATE) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION DEHAT DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENT (BY MS. ANKITA MATHUR - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the CrPC for grant of bail relating to FIR No. 12 of 2024 registered at Police Station Dehat, District Shivpuri (M. P. ) for the offence under Section 34 (2) of Excise Act.

Allegation against the present applicant is that 108 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from the joint possession of present applicant and co-accused without having any valid license. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIPIN KUMAR Signing time: 02-02-2024 10:08:16 AM and has been falsely implicated. He is in custody since 12. 01. 2024. It is further submitted that offence is triable by JMFC and trial is likely to take long time to conclude. Applicant is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions imposed by this Court while granting bail. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:- 1) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him; 2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be; 3 ) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4) The applicant will not commit any other offence or will not repeat the offence in future.

In case, if he/she is found involving in the offence of same nature, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Bench. Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIPIN KUMAR Signing time: 02-02-2024 10:08:16 AM 5) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and 6 ) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be. (7) The applicant shall mark his attendance before the SHO of the concerning police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of investigation. Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action. E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court. Certified copy as per rules.

(SUNITA YADAV) JUDGE vpn Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIPIN KUMAR Signing time: 02-02-2024 10:08:16 AM

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.